XFastest終極版



請未滿20歲網友,勿點勿看!

謝謝配合!

z.





按這裡檢視外部影片 (按這裡在新視窗中開啟影片)


nVIDIA GeFore 9800GTX 512MB正式發表

9800GTX規格:

NVIDIA單卡王者?GeFore 9800GTX終於發表,就跟NDA解禁前小弟所說的,nVIDIA在2007年末~2008年的4月這段時間,在於市場上一點都不甘寂寞。
G92核心也一路從8800GT狂玩到現在的9800GTX,9800GTX除了在核心頻率更高一點點之外...,再來就是3-Way SLI的技術支援、HybridPower與H.264加速~PureVideo HD VP3(8800GTS 512MB為PureVideo HD VP2)。
另外採用核心4相加記憶體2相獨立供電模組,整個9800GTX的電源模組比8800GTS 512MB更High end(我確定是在介紹顯示卡..並非高級音響V.V )。

這是王卡該有的樣子嗎:

記憶體採用了三星0.8ns-GDDR3顆粒Samsung K4J52324QE-BJ08,單顆規格64MB,正面一共八顆組成了512M/256bit的規格,更不同的一點為一年多前的8800 Ultra使用的技術規格,都還比今年出的這張9800GTX還要更狂暴..。這樣說吧!!
9800GTX性能和8800GTS 512MB幾乎是一樣,只不過核心超了一點點,記憶體時脈多了一點點,什麼都是一點點V.V (看到這nVIDIA或許會想打我的頭,可是這真的是實話..忠言逆耳阿nVIDIA! )。
NVIDIA自從2006年11月發布GeForce 8800 Ultra系列以來,應該這麼說...;發表「GTX」這個代號以來,一般在玩家心目中大都會認為這是Ultra的次一級別,沒錯!這次nVIDIA又做到了,不但效能沒有超越一年前的GeForce 8800 Ultra,效能上也只超越了8800GTS[?]一點點,核心、規格一樣的狀態下,其實這也是意料中的事了..。


GTX都不GTX了:

所以今天小弟並不想在[G92核心]上再次著墨太多,如果玩家大大們你之前已經買了8800GTS 512MB、9600GT 512,恭喜你..這次的9800GTX可以不用換了,除非你想搞一套3-Way SLI的規格來使用,不然這樣的規格就像文末
一些網友所批評的,作為一代王卡,但卻無王者風範,此張9800GTX只推薦給還未購買8800GTS的User使用,只能說...GTX都不GTX了..!!


批評都批了就來正式的測試看看(笑?)效能吧!! (抱歉今天不太想搞笑V.V...因為nVIDIA可能.....在我背後想狠狠的敲我的頭...XD)


9800GTX外觀:

9800GTX本體


另一面外觀


9800GTX背面


3-Way SLI金手指部分


6Pin+6Pin電源供應模組


側面進風口與壯觀電容


拆~裸卡與風扇分離照


2008年第3周A2版本
可以看到晶片一樣是G92-400核心..


記憶體顆粒Samsung K4J52324QE-BJ08


9800GTX裸卡前方視圖


卡的後方..
壯觀的電容-採用核心4相加記憶體2相獨立供電模組!


另一角度


解體風扇
可以看到熱導管樣式


熱導管下方照


熱導管上方照


這次做比較的9800GX2



測試開始:

硬體資訊一覽:
CPU:QX9650 & E8500@3.6G~4G
RAM: Geil DDR 800@ 1000 5 5 5 5
MB:ASUS P5K-E WIFI Bios 1011版
HDD:WD 250G X3 AAKS 16M RAID-0
顯示卡:9800GTX & 9800GX2
OS: Vista 64
POWER: TT 750W

測試軟體:

3D Mark 06
實測遊戲軟體:Crysis

同樣先比較的3D Mark06測試,CPU測試時脈開始於3.6G起跳,9800GTX直接不跑預設值了,直接衝上GPU 800Mhz / 記憶體1150Mhz。
不同的將只是CPU時脈的不同所產生分數的差異性,給各位參考一下!!^^

QX9650 @ 3.6G 9800GTX GPU 800Mhz / 記憶體1150Mhz

1280*1024 NOAA 分數15915



1280*1024 2AA 分數13782


1280*1024 4AA 分數12087


1280*1024 8AA 分數9657



QX9650 @ 4G 9800GTX GPU 800Mhz / 記憶體1150Mhz
CPU提升400Mhz在同個解析度下分數多了300分。

1280*1024 NOAA 分數16198


1280*1024 2AA 分數13977


1280*1024 4AA 分數12251


1280*1024 8AA 分數9735


Intel E8500雙核心@4G下,9800GX2 3D Mark06比較測試
9800GX2核心超頻至750Mhz / 記憶體1100Mhz
得到分數如下

1208*1024 NOAA 分數17928


1280*1024 2AA 分數17190


可以看到9800GX2的部分開了反鋸齒,分數下降幅度不會如此之高,雙顆G92核心的9800GX2優勢在此展露無遺,可是價格也"很不美麗"...。

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Crysis測試:

免不了的真實遊戲測試,即將測試於High與Very high這2個模式下的分數比較。

9800GTX預設值下(未超頻)
Run #1- DX10 800x600 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 64.48
Run #2- DX10 800x600 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 57.455
Run #3- DX10 800x600 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 54.415
Run #4- DX10 800x600 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 53.67
Run #5- DX10 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 43.93
Run #6- DX10 1280x1024 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 32.495
Run #7- DX10 1280x1024 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 23.545
Run #8- DX10 1280x1024 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 27.08
Run #9- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 34.02
Run #10- DX10 1680x1050 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 23.6
Run #11- DX10 1680x1050 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 16.725
Run #12- DX10 1680x1050 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 6.365
Run #13- DX10 1900x1200 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 25.505


Very high模式

Run #1- DX10 800x600 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 43.91
Run #2- DX10 800x600 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 38.065
Run #3- DX10 800x600 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 35.98
Run #4- DX10 800x600 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 28.395
Run #5- DX10 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 21.42
Run #6- DX10 1280x1024 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 18.055
Run #7- DX10 1280x1024 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 15.065
Run #8- DX10 1280x1024 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 14.025
Run #9- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 17.25
Run #10- DX10 1680x1050 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 12.675
Run #11- DX10 1680x1050 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 9.875
Run #12- DX10 1680x1050 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 9.155
Run #13- DX10 1900x1200 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 14.095


核心超頻790Mhz / 記憶體1158Mhz (天空模式)
Run #1- DX10 800x600 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 64.965
Run #2- DX10 800x600 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 61.355
Run #3- DX10 800x600 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 58.97
Run #4- DX10 800x600 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 56.27
Run #5- DX10 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 47.57
Run #6- DX10 1280x1024 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 35.635
Run #7- DX10 1280x1024 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 24.665
Run #8- DX10 1280x1024 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 24.05
Run #9- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.595
Run #10- DX10 1680x1050 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 28.815
Run #11- DX10 1680x1050 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 18.355
Run #12- DX10 1680x1050 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 17.11
Run #13- DX10 1900x1200 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 30.705


核心超頻800Mhz / 記憶體1158Mhz (天空模式)
Run #1- DX10 800x600 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 68.435
Run #2- DX10 800x600 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 63.965
Run #3- DX10 800x600 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 57.165
Run #4- DX10 800x600 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 55.01
Run #5- DX10 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 49.47
Run #6- DX10 1280x1024 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 41.36
Run #7- DX10 1280x1024 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 31.37
Run #8- DX10 1280x1024 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 29.67
Run #9- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.685
Run #10- DX10 1680x1050 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 26.38
Run #11- DX10 1680x1050 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 21.18
Run #12- DX10 1680x1050 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 16.79
Run #13- DX10 1900x1200 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 30.765


核心超頻800Mhz / 記憶體1158Mhz (陸地模式)
Run #1- DX10 800x600 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 55.59
Run #2- DX10 800x600 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 59.35
Run #3- DX10 800x600 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 56.065
Run #4- DX10 800x600 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 55.155
Run #5- DX10 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 44.87
Run #6- DX10 1280x1024 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 37.08
Run #7- DX10 1280x1024 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 31.08
Run #8- DX10 1280x1024 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 29.445
Run #9- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 35.6
Run #10- DX10 1680x1050 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 25.48
Run #11- DX10 1680x1050 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 21.365
Run #12- DX10 1680x1050 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 19.05
Run #13- DX10 1900x1200 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 29.335


核心超頻800Mhz / 記憶體1158Mhz (Very high天空模式)
Run #1- DX10 800x600 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 44.955
Run #2- DX10 800x600 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 32.96
Run #3- DX10 800x600 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 39.61
Run #4- DX10 800x600 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 32.27
Run #5- DX10 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 26.19
Run #6- DX10 1280x1024 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 21.075
Run #7- DX10 1280x1024 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 18.095
Run #8- DX10 1280x1024 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 17.19
Run #9- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 19.99
Run #10- DX10 1680x1050 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 15.435
Run #11- DX10 1680x1050 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 12.21
Run #12- DX10 1680x1050 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 10.18
Run #13- DX10 1900x1200 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Overall Average FPS: 15.09


最後一張為9800GX2測試於Intel E8500雙核心超頻至4G下所得到的分數,9800GX2全部預設值(陸地模式)
此張圖分數給各位參考,以自己心中所想下去做評分..。

Run #1- DX10 800x600 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 55.48
Run #2- DX10 800x600 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 53.62
Run #3- DX10 800x600 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 51.53
Run #4- DX10 800x600 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 51.62
Run #5- DX10 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 53.83
Run #6- DX10 1280x1024 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 48.865
Run #7- DX10 1280x1024 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 40.55
Run #8- DX10 1280x1024 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 27.3
Run #9- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 49.23
Run #10- DX10 1680x1050 AA=2x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 40.04
Run #11- DX10 1680x1050 AA=4x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 26.865
Run #12- DX10 1680x1050 AA=8x, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 20.5
Run #13- DX10 1920x1080 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 42.625


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

結語:

大貓貓網友:

電源都用上雙6了 當然會更穩
我想穩是穩在記憶體上

因為GPU一樣是四相
不過 不知道目前預設電壓是多少?
8800GTS是1.15V的樣子?
如果MOD上1.4V是可以破900 但是這種熱度是連HR03GT都壓不住

9800GTX主要強就是強在3 WAY SLI跟HP POWER 跟記憶體供電吧

GPU感覺體質差不多

不過更長的PCB+雙六 其實意義不大~~
更難裝而已~

不知道8800GTS會降到多少 我這張技嘉的之前買10800說

Adsmt網友:

果然是一張沒什麼意義的卡.....
GX2 SLi 4-way 都飛不起來了,3-way 還能有什麼搞頭....
我覺得它連叫 8900GTX 的資格都沒有.....

pcdvd.02@hotmai 網友:

9800GTX會不會是nvidia有史以來最便宜的GTX啊 !

jones186網友:

看來8800GTS 512就夠用了.....沒有升級的必要

justsold網友:

..............騙錢騙太兇了吧 , 這性能和8800GTS 512MB幾乎是一樣 . XD

MSI的8800GTS 512MB才賣一萬台幣有找的說 XD

果然要等G100再換阿XD

digictx網友:

超虛的9800GTX啊..怪誰?
當然是怪ATI啊...都是ATI的錯啦

5800U>6800GT>7800GTX>8800GTX>9800GTX
原本每一代都是初發表的高階卡,再發表中低階卡
其實大家都知道,現在的9800GTX根本應該是叫8900GTX
她的出現跟5900,7900其實很類似,就是小改版
而9600GT應該叫8700一類才恰當
她的出現跟5700也很相似,不過改版幅度較有誠意
NV這次的9系列沒有改朝換代的感覺
大概是學AMD的1>2>3系列一樣,也是沒啥改進
就是換各新一代的名字來刺激消費吧

copernicus網友:

呵呵, 同意, 了不起叫8900GT, 真正的GTX, 怎麼不拿G80去做65nm 然後出個800/2000/1100 的384bit 65nm G80這樣至少有成意一點點

結果他現在叫9800GTX...

zeusforce網友:

9800GTX這麼響亮的名稱只有這點效能
果然沒競爭就沒進步
這會是NV系列卡史上2代王卡差距最小的嗎?
(8800GTX只是製程差了一些規格更好吧)


cheochi網友:

真正的笑能卡一張.... XD

JingLi網友:

9800GTX這種卡我想對於已經在使用8800GT與GTS或是早期的GTX的玩家來說,
我想沒有多大吸引力,
畢竟效能的突破沒有明顯的超過約50%左右,
但是必須要額外的提供另外一組6PIN電源去推這塊卡就略顯毫無益處,
雖然多了一組電源的結果是可以讓記憶體的供電更穩定,
可是我想都還是基於G80的規格去做小更動就讓我自己沒有興趣掏出鈔票來購買,
可能也很像版友們說到的一樣,
算是一張非常短壽命的高階卡吧!
本來我還期待能出記憶體頻寬384BIT的9800GTX,
我想這樣可能還比較有非常大的吸引力,
另外,當時的8800GTS512我個人購買技嘉的只花10200大洋。
比起上面的幾位版友還要來的便宜 XD

韋少網友:

應該是新版8800gt 跟 8800gts 效能比預期好太多了!
都把大家餵飽了*.*

這款出來對已經有8800gt 跟 8800gts 的玩家已經沒什麼吸引力了...

Raziel網友:

其實我覺得叫個8850GT算是給面子了.....
兩個月前就提過, 萬一真出個滿規格的超頻G80(並換新製程), 那應該就有比較兇了.
結果還是只有這樣的德性. 真相真是令人難以接受.
刻意把9800這個名號做爛, 不知是否因為N社潛意識跟AMD有心結.... XD

auristar網友:

單卡用到單六加單四PIN電源就很耗電了,若用到雙六PIN的電源線,那真得是用耗電來換性能,更何況性能也沒比8800快多少,又不支援DX10.1,買這種卡只能說是瘋狂追求新品,沒有實質上的意義 V.V


ILOVE156網友:

一體兩面

最黑皮的莫過於8800GTX USER

不管是剛上市購入先爽一年的還是後來買10K左右二手的

看到9800GTX這等身手~莫不暗自竊喜押對寶兒

並殷殷期盼G100捎來的佳音。


以上就是玩家們最真實的聲音XD
看來Crysis要跑的"超順",只好等5、6月的G100~G200核心了。
小弟發現這次測試我測的很不用心,不管是文字上...態度上,(跟nVIDIA一樣?不用心發表這次的新產品??)
nVIDIA最新發表的9800GTX,竟然無法贏過已經發售超過一年多的[G80核心]GeForce 8800 Ultra,只是一在的用G92換湯不換藥的情況下作類似發表新產品。
甚至規格還輸了一年多年前的GeForce 8800 Ultra。
以上就是NDA發售前夕,小弟測試於PCDVD網站上的網友回應來作總結,上面發言才是玩家最真實的聲音。
當然也替小弟省下不少寫結論的時間,感謝這些網友大大們XD。


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

我想看了此次nVIDIA 9800GTX的各位大大們,應該不免失望了。(還未購買的User除外,應該還會慶幸沒有在8800GTS時期就出手購買XD )
雖然如此,產品當然還是要請出Model來介紹囉^^"
廢話不多說了...!就讓我們開始今天的9800GTX實品介紹吧 0.0

Nicole手上所拿的麗台9800GTX外盒包裝


9800GTX的實物本體,比當時的8800GTS還要更長,當然電源也已經做成雙6 Pin..



Nicole指定購買麗台9800GTX,請認明選購!! =.=+


Nicole很"兇"的再次指定,如果溫柔一點應該沒有人聽得進去XD
(太兇的話請PM小弟..改天會請Model脾氣溫和一點.. )


這次的新人Nana,此次負責介紹SPARKLE的產品介紹~ =.=+
產品外盒比麗台簡潔許多,這才是環保的表現XD 。


SPARKLE 9800GTX本體,目前市面上所有9800GTX全都nVIDIA公版卡,只有各家貼紙跟保固上的不同。
喜歡那家就購買哪家的產品吧^^ 。


SPARKLE 9800GTX卡本體與配件一覽


Nicole指定購買麗台,為了不讓2家廠商吃醋Nana指定購買SPARKLE的 (z.你在掰嘛 XD )


Nana再次指定購買 XD

Nana:請喜歡SPARKLE這家廠商的User指定購買SPARKLE的9800GTX唷^^~


nVIDIA公版卡大集合XD
最前方就是純正nVIDIA的9800GTX,後方由左至右 SPARKLE 9800GTX、SPARKLE 9800GX2、
麗台9800GTX 2張, 真是壯觀=.=+


Mobile01傳統貼背樂... 嘴賤說錯..這是正統疊疊樂
Nana指定購買SPARKLE 產品,Nicole指定購買麗台9800GTX

PS.如果有人對此張疊疊樂有意見請PM小弟,小弟將....不會理你



只能說..成也nV敗也nV阿
2家廠商的競爭在短期內應該已經可以獲得紓解了,在這樣玩下去...輸的不是ATI與nVIDIA這兩家廠商..。
而是消費者失去的信心~


以上產品介紹到這

謝謝各位的收看^^

z.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

下次測試產品Logitech diNovo Mini