上網查了許多相關這支手機的資料，它號稱環保機，但單機價格也太不親民了，要快一萬耶~這難道是環保的代價嗎?有人覺得好用嗎?
個人積分：10分
文章編號：19475601
個人積分：43分
文章編號：19481428
個人積分：5分
文章編號：19482335
福州人 wrote:
上網查了許多相關這支...(恕刪)
手機功能跟價位相比較之下是還OK拉，但對於環保這件事我完全感覺不到..
以下來自友站
Elm 採用了包括循環再造塑膠材質、內建電子說明書、環保計算機、不含有毒物質與精簡的使用指南等措施
請問以上哪一項讓你覺得環保??
不如參考一下綠色和平組織今年的報告，看看這些消費電子廠的表現
任天堂是怎樣..........
7.3
Nokia -- Remains in first place with good scores on toxics use reduction, but loses points on energy. More...
6.9
Sony Ericsson -- Moves up with top marks on toxics elimination but weak on recycling. More...
5.3
Toshiba -- Good score on toxics elimination but needs to meet upcoming phase out commitment by March 2010. More...
5.3
Philips -- Loses points for failing to lobby for phase out of hazardous substance in legislation. More...
5.1
Apple -- Continues to improve, scoring best on eliminating toxic chemicals and e-waste criteria. More...
5.1
LG Electronics -- LG score improves, but is still penalized for postponing date for toxics phase out. More...
5.1
Sony -- Maintains overall score with better energy total, but needs to lobby for stronger chemicals legislation. More...
5.1
Motorola -- Slightly reduced score, due to lack of lobbying for stronger chemicals legislation. More...
5.1
Samsung == Big drop due to penalty point for failing to meet commitment to phase out hazardous substances. More...
4.9
Panasonic -- Score unchanged, strongest on energy but poor on e-waste and recycling. More...
4.7
HP -- Improved position thanks to clear support for global emissions reductions, but needs to lobby for improved chemical legislation. More...
4.5
Acer == Score unchanged but Acer is lobbying for stronger chemicals legislation. More...
4.5
Sharp -- Loses points due to poor information on toxics elimination and fails to support stronger chemicals legislation. More...
3.9
Dell == Reduced score on energy criteria and penalty point for delaying toxics phase out till 2011. More...
3.5
Fujitsu -- Improved score due to support for global carbon emission reductions and cutting its own emissions. More...
2.5
Lenovo -- Score unchanged, with penalty point for indefinite delay on toxics phase out. More...
2.4
Microsoft -- Reduced score, fails to support strong chemicals legislation. More...
1.4
Nintendo == Nintendo remains in last place with the same score. More...
個人積分：3436分
文章編號：19485211
個人積分：272分
文章編號：19486686
個人積分：3分
文章編號：19487350
個人積分：74分
文章編號：19487638
