johnsonwang_925 wrote:
可以考慮現代的Santafe...(恕刪)
其實以QX60的售價來說馬力並不算小 比起同樣是LSUV的XC90跟Q7 QX60有V6引擎加速動力源源不絕 而且配備也比較好
當然跟MPV車型比起來七人座LSUV空間一定比較小 主要看需求 不然QX60其實C/P值不錯
denniscool wrote:
沒內鐵後方撞擊力量怎麼傳導?
第三排直接潰縮?...(恕刪)
denniscool wrote:這裡有一段美國 NHTSA 對於保險桿的 Q&A, 其中提到:
2) What is the purpose of bumpers?
The car bumper is designed to prevent or reduce physical damage to the front and rear end of passenger motor vehicles in low-speed collisions. Automobile bumpers are not typically designed to be structural components that would significantly contribute to vehicle crashworthiness or occupant protection during front or rear collisions. It is not a safety feature intended to prevent or mitigate injury severity to occupants in the passenger cars. Bumpers are designed to protect the hood, trunk, grille, fuel, exhaust and cooling system as well as safety related equipment such as parking lights, headlamps and taillights in low speed collisions.
簡單的翻譯彙整 (節錄自 Autoth.com 論壇 longman 發言):
保險桿的目的
1. 降低低速撞擊時的車身受損程度
2. 保險桿在設計時並不是用來當做重要的車身結構組件,不負責預防或降低車內乘客於撞擊事件中的傷害程度。
3. 在低速撞擊發生時,保險桿是用來保護引擎蓋、行李廂、水箱罩、供油系統、排氣系統、冷卻系統、頭燈、尾燈
換句話說, 保險桿的設計, 跟車內成員的安全, 是沒有關聯的!!, 他純粹只是要保護車子的機件, 以期在低速撞擊時, 車輛仍能維持正常運作.
小弟本身對保桿內鐵並無一定成見, 但由以上解釋看來, 似乎不應將「內鐵」與「乘員安全」相提並論.