http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=757&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=4&API=1&LensComp=738&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=4&APIComp=0
廣角端表現不比胖白還差,但望遠端就不行了...
個人積分：6139分
文章編號：24684306
Tamron 70-300 VC NTD 16000
三倍耶
slrclub的測試:
http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=slr_review&no=188
http://www.flickr.com/photo.gne?id=
個人積分：1分
文章編號：24684439
個人積分：1519分
文章編號：24684600
個人積分：12分
文章編號：24684828
R6.2 wrote:
http://www...(恕刪)
Although this website is quite popular but I personally believe "the-digital-picture.com" is pretty biased and does not offer objective review on thrid party lenses.
For example, if you check out how he comments on Sigma 50mm F1.4 then you will see. No matter how good a third party lens is, he always come up with something from Canon and claims that Canon is better.
I browse his website only when I am comparing two Canon lenses.
Cheers and have a nice day.
個人積分：6139分
文章編號：24684858
個人積分：1519分
文章編號：24685096
個人積分：2分
文章編號：24685214
個人積分：1519分
文章編號：24685291
個人積分：2分
文章編號：24685605
