louischow0201 wrote:EF 40/2.8...(恕刪) 當然是501.8要散景夠糊不考慮拍攝當下的條件二個重點1.焦段愈長散景愈糊2.光圈愈大散景愈糊所以501.8跟402.8要散景夠糊就要選501.8
實際拍攝照片1.全開光圈加上最近距離對焦,景深是很淺的。EF 50 F1.8 STM Review by CODEANT STUDIOS, 於 Flickr2.有時候失光現象也是一種效果,即便是開放光圈的中央部位也是很銳利的,就是邊角不給力。EF 50 F1.8 STM Review by CODEANT STUDIOS, 於 Flickr3.挑素一點的背景,最大光圈下整個虛化的散景,還是挺好看的。EF 50 F1.8 STM Review by CODEANT STUDIOS, 於 Flickr4.有二線性嗎?EF 50 F1.8 STM Review by CODEANT STUDIOS, 於 Flickr5.忠實的色彩表現,沒有特殊之處。EF 50 F1.8 STM Review by CODEANT STUDIOS, 於 Flickr6.解像力絕對及格了,甚至很好了。EF 50 F1.8 STM Review by CODEANT STUDIOS, 於 Flickr7.最近對焦距離變短了,畫面的變化也會變多。EF 50 F1.8 STM Review by CODEANT STUDIOS, 於 Flickr8.偏冷調,平平淡淡的色彩,其實也很耐看。EF 50 F1.8 STM Review by CODEANT STUDIOS, 於 Flickr9.縮一下光圈,畫面清晰,質感提昇。EF 50 F1.8 STM Review by CODEANT STUDIOS, 於 Flickr10.油油亮亮的感覺有出來。EF 50 F1.8 STM Review by CODEANT STUDIOS, 於 Flickr11.EF 50 F1.8 STM Review by CODEANT STUDIOS, 於 Flickr12. 細節的表現可圈可點EF 50 F1.8 STM Review by CODEANT STUDIOS, 於 Flickr
Cheng-Tsai wrote:先佔個位子EF 50mm...(恕刪) 還沒休假..還是只能先拍自己的相機這顆鏡頭真的滿推薦的XDDDPENTAX K-3 by Chun Cheng Tsai, 於 Flickr