個人積分：233分
文章編號：23461241
個人積分：16分
文章編號：23822700
個人積分：180分
文章編號：23823071
君不見許多婚禮婚紗，甚至各種商業用途拍攝，都選擇上述這兩款機身，
反倒是D700甚少聽聞相關方面的熱烈好評與搶購風潮，
因此D700的後繼機能否擊敗Canon 5D2，尚未知之數，
機身內的色彩調性與選擇控制，需要加強，
很多玩家是為了拍正妹去買Canon 5D2，且確實拍攝效果都能輕易滿足玩家與正妹，
Nikon不知有無意識到這塊龐大的正妹市場？
也許白種人喜歡被拍成古銅色，曬黃黃的表示有錢有閒才能去度假日光浴，
但是黃種人就是不喜歡被拍黃，白裡透紅才是黃種人的美感指標，
Nikon喜歡黃色這點，讓許多人跳槽至Canon。
個人積分：0分
文章編號：23823186
Thom Hogan’s predictions for 2011
D800: announced by end of March 2011.
D700-type body, new Nikon FX high resolution sensor fabbed by Sony
18-24mp
4-5fps
1080P/24/25/30, 720P/24/25/30/60
100% viewfinder
EN-EL15
MB-D12 grip
Yes, it's still coming. At Nikon speed (didn't anyone at Nikon ever watch Star Trek? Impulse Drive is the slow speed; we want engineering at Warp Speed ;~)
He also mentions the 2010 major camera companies performance:
Companies on the Rise
Leica
Nikon
Panasonic
--------------------------------------
Companies Falling
Canon
Fujifilm
Kodak
Sigma
Samsung
---------------------------------------
Hard to Tell
Sony
Casio
Pentax
Ricoh
Olympus
個人積分：3323分
文章編號：23823531
黑輪桑 wrote:
Canon 5D與C...(恕刪)
CANON擁有的優勢可多!
1.香爐接環，5D或5D2是許多鏡頭轉接第一選擇，雖然NEX或 M4/3可以轉更多，但都還不是FF!
5D會是這些老鏡解放最簡單路徑!
2.CANON自過去建立品牌與鏡頭群，NIKON大光圈鏡群與其他鏡群是後面才補齊但也貴非常多。
3.5D是當時唯一可以有機會接近的FF機身，通常只要看過一次FF感光元件畫質就會感受到其威力，包刮當時NIKON D200性能在高也相形失色，後面D700也是一樣，5D2讓那些人可以同價位獲得更高解析度影像機會，用料與堅固性，機身性能都是需要時間才能發覺其好處，影像一看就上手!
等到發覺到這些重要時，通常已經一堆鏡頭賣掉也買不回同規N鏡幾顆!
4. CANON故意塑造空缺，7D和1D有性能但就是APS-(C or H)，1Ds有性能也有FF但價位就高!
沒有得選擇!
個人積分：0分
文章編號：23823571
個人積分：3323分
文章編號：23823633
leedwin1 wrote:
若d4 改成51點全...(恕刪)
您知道2.8對焦點是什麼意思嘛?
那是指鏡頭開放光圈必須大於F2.8以上才可以啟動這個AF SENSOR!
所以像C家要就是像一條F2.8+另一條F5.6交叉，在小小白這種F4以下就只剩一字!
CANON DSLR 性能演進與簡史
這個之前小弟寫的!
對焦原理部份
a.
這個是相位偵測對焦的基本原理，就類似以前分裂式對焦屏一樣，只是現在用相位來做判斷！
對焦精準度在於鏡片前後如果微量移動，ＡＦ ＳＥＮＳＯＲ有沒有辦法分辨那個位置是對！
b.
這個是上Ｆ２.８和下Ｆ５.６對焦感測器，可以看到Ｆ２.８是因為取到光徑大，所以在分光投影在ＡＦ ＳＥＮＳＯＲ的位移量變大，所以等於把鏡片移動造成相位差變化放大檢視一樣，所以可以做精準對焦。
c.
這個是經分光到達ＡＦ ＳＥＮＳＯＲ，可以看到Ｆ５.６的兩孔比較近，所以對鏡頭來說可以擷取光強度較高，這也就是為何Ｆ５.6可以有較高靈敏度！所以一般Ｆ５.６作主對焦判斷，Ｆ２.８做對焦輔助修正，取其各自優點。
而Ｆ２.８對焦感測為何不能用小於Ｆ２.８光圈，因為擷取位置是很外圈邊緣的光徑，所以光圈小於他就沒辦法可以讓光跑進去，像１Ｄ４可以支援到Ｆ４大概修正這邊距離！
為何在暗處會拉風箱，在於接受光的強度在ＡＦ ＳＥＮＳＯＲ的 Ｓ／Ｎ小緣故（就像高ISO)，所以機身無法判斷！
而高階機身可以在這邊SENSOR做處理，把訊號處理變好一點可以讓機身判斷！
個人積分：0分
文章編號：23823972
個人積分：1519分
文章編號：23824403
個人積分：172分
文章編號：23827583
下一波推出的應該是搭載著1800萬像素的D800(2011年三月)
# D800: announced by end of March 2011.
* D700-type body, new Nikon FX high resolution sensor fabbed by Sony
* 18-24mp
* 4-5fps
* 1080P/24/25/30, 720P/24/25/30/60
* 100% viewfinder
* EN-EL15
* MB-D12 grip
* Yes, it's still coming. At Nikon speed (didn't anyone at Nikon ever watch Star Trek? Impulse Drive is the slow speed; we want engineering at Warp Speed ;~)
而D4將會在2011年的八月推出
# D4: announced by August 2011
* new Nikon 18mp sensor with at least D3-like capability, maybe better
* completely new AF system
* better metering system (upgraded from D7000)
* Hard core video features (perhaps even 1080P/60)
* Integrated GPS
* USB 3.0
* Updated UDMA specs
* Big question: D4h and D4x, or D4 only? The high-megapixel FX sensor rumors swirling around Sony include a Nikon variant. The question is whether Nikon has moved up the pro "studio" camera to be introduced with the pro "performance" camera again (last time that happened was the D1h/D1x intro). I think the odds are good that they could, as the only real engineering difference is the sensor, and the sensor appears to be ready. Still, there's a big potential pileup in terms of marketing differentiation if Nikon pulls out all the stops (D400, D800, D4h, D4x). I can't see them doing more than three of those choices in one year, and even that is expecting them to be aggressive. I expect at most two high megapixel announcements (D4, D800).
而D300S的後繼機將有可能與D4同步推出
# D400: announced late in the year (August or later). The real question is what changes from a D300s?
* The D7000 16mp sensor, but with faster frame rates (both still and video)
* A new focus sensor, likely a derivative of the D4's
* 1080P/24/25/30, 720P/24/25/30/60
* Hard core pro body (more gasketing, possibly integrated grip)
* Integrated GPS?
* EN-EL15 battery?
* Or, here's the alternative rumor: 24mp Nikon/Sony DX (yes DX) sensor in the D300s body with the D7000 metering and autofocus. This alternative doesn't make sense to me because it is literally at the limit of discernible resolution returns. Moreover, virtually all of Nikon's DX lenses will come up short in resolution, meaning we'd need another cycle of DX lenses. Makes sense from the "we'll make things that force them to buy again new" standpoint, but makes no sense at all when examined from a practical standpoint. Moreover, this would be the end of the line for DX as far as I'm concerned. Final note: if 24mp DX is the D400 alternative chosen, then the D800 probably won't appear in 2011. Nikon would be very confused trying to market a high megapixel D400, D800, and D4 at the same time. Thus, I'm sticking with 16mp, more hard core pro, as outlined above.
期待啦，D300S的後繼機將有可能走上2400萬像素階級
出了泥坑進了索尼，喜愛拍貓
