不要再戰altis的安全性,戰鬥力強有錯嗎?

快加入反T陣營
尊爵 懂車 不凡
操控 安全 熱血~
超讚!

打個卡做記號

其待後續發展
No, I don't have it. It doesn't mean Altis is not safe. The report you referred to doesn't say Altis isn't safe, either. What is your points? Does the agency dare to say lighter car is not safe ? Do you want to conclude that Altis is not safe from that report? Furthermore, the report is not about car weight which was in your first reply. So weight is out of discussion?


湘蔡 wrote:This article was iss
Instead of keeping talking, you should start do some research..

First of all, you made a hilarious statement "還有人用車重比較安不安全,真是笑掉所有汽車專家的大牙", and too bad various research results reported car weight affects the risk in collision. If you don't believe that, please provide research supports your argument.

Relationship of Vehicle Weight
to Fatality and Injury Risk


Then you turned around and stated "Is there any evidence saying that Altis is "not safe" at its class?".
So I gave you its crashing test result showed Altis/Corolla just did poorly in the newest test.

Now you are asking a report literally stating Altis is not a safe car? What's your point exactly? Just change topic all the time instead of providing any evidence to support your statements?!

Safe is a comparative term. Altis/Corolla is definitely safer than Yaris or Smart, but I don't think its safer than Camry or Avalon. Too bad even among its class, it's not a top safe car based on the crashing test result. Of course a safer car is not always the best seller. But keep ignoring all the facts presented in front of you shows how plain ignorant you are..



ioushiou wrote:
No, I don't have it. It doesn't mean Altis is not safe. The report you referred to doesn't say Altis isn't safe, either. What is your points? Does the agency dare to say lighter car is not safe ? Do you want to conclude that Altis is not safe from that report? Furthermore, the report is not about car weight which was in your first reply. So weight is out of discussion?

Kennybee27 wrote:
說實在 沒啥好吵
若你認為命重要 就買台好車
若你認為錢重要 就買台便宜的車
以上都在賭 一個賭修車 一個賭命
我已經過了賭命階段 所以買好車
但這5~8年來也幾乎沒修到啥..(恕刪)


請問你賭命賭了幾年,這麼簡單你為何要賭命?
comsew wrote:
又說糊了....拿薪資出來比真的很沒意義

六七十萬的車就不應該配有至少的安全設備?!

又說來很多同級車都配有更多的主被動安全

這樣完全是自打嘴巴

到底是哪來的論點?! 沒錢就沒有安全?!

並不是窮人就比較低賤...一樣都是人阿...(恕刪)


買不起車的只能騎機車,被地下錢莊逼死的新聞,你說呢?沒錢就沒有安全(危險的工作為什麼有人要做?

人家有多少錢做多少事不行嗎? 買車要買你喜歡的? 請問誰出錢?
吵什麼,我96年CEFlRO只有一顆氣囊,照開不誤,二顆就要酸成這様,你知道路上有多少車連汽球都沒有
我記得很多發財車連車頭潰縮區都沒有, 更不要說安全氣囊了, 馬路上還不是一堆在跑,
路上 altis 由第1代到現在10幾代都馬有人在開, 光靠靠嘴炮是不會改變市佔率的,
除非本田可以不要拔配備..
不然豐田應該在台灣很難動搖..
其它車款感覺也沒有想要跟豐田鬥的態勢..
感覺都只想撿省下的群族..
我大概賭命 快15年 1990~2005 但當年幾乎所有國產車配備都差不多
當年有個雙氣囊 ABS 電子噴射加電動窗 四輪碟煞的配備就已經頂天了
但...現在 買家可以選擇更多 四~六氣囊 ESP 更高剛性車體的車 不少
當年學生 國產車開開 入社會月薪3萬多 努力快3年到5萬多
還是開國產車 但都是國產性能車款...當年就那幾台
到目前...月收入是當初的好幾倍 有時後月入就可以買台歐系車
但還是同時有買國產車及進口鋼砲車 1A2B 沒興趣 想直上更高階

買車是可以更聰明 至少現在各車廠配備差異頗大
話說SUPER SENTRA 想打ASTIS 光ESP拿掉...我看難了
至於豐田車款...我已經不在考慮...有開過就了解
現在有些車廠 我覺得真的把買家當白癡傻蛋...
現在來看...我到覺得低姿態的FORD跟MAZDA
給的安全配備比較有誠意


lkk77 wrote:
請問你賭命賭了幾年,這麼簡單你為何要賭命?
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 37)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!