yenchee wrote:
太古DSG不也是給五...(恕刪)
這是吵回來的吧
而且沒 DSG 車款
還不是只有四年
不是嗎？？？
有這樣困難嗎？
對了 Toureg 還十年保固
不是嗎？
個人積分：64分
文章編號：43152208
個人積分：1分
文章編號：43152283
個人積分：112分
文章編號：43152416
個人積分：8890分
文章編號：43152426
原來還有經過美運輸機關認證車廠重要零件出問題
DOT 25-10
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Contact: Olivia Alair
Telephone: (202) 366-4570
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The U.S. Department of Transportation learned today of a third Toyota recall involving 2010 Prius hybrids and Lexus HS 250h vehicles experiencing brake system problems. Some 2010 Camrys prone to brake fluid leaks have also been recalled.
"Last Thursday, NHTSA opened a formal investigation of 2010 Toyota Prius hybrid vehicles in response to consumer complaints about braking difficulties, and today, Toyota has acknowledged a safety defect," said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. "When I spoke with Toyota President Akio Toyoda last week, he assured me that his company takes U.S. safety concerns very seriously. The U.S. DOT will remain in constant communication with Toyota to hold them to that promise. In the meantime, if you are concerned about your car's braking performance, contact your Toyota dealer."
-------
個人積分：1432分
文章編號：43152499
個人積分：64分
文章編號：43152529
yenchee wrote:
太古DSG不也是給五...(恕刪)
對了
我在送給你一個更好的例子
雖然你的車用不到
不過比自己早一代的車子
可以參考一下
所謂的 NHTSA 介入是如何
Passat 起火調查
個人積分：124分
文章編號：43152554
krispykremeII wrote:
我想你應該不知道
NHTSA 介入是怎樣的吧
基本上來講
只要任何一個人去 NHTSA 網站申訴
就會有 Investigation
我想是你不知道NHTSA介入吧, 隨便一個人介入NHTSA就開investigation
那大概就調查不完了, NHTSA開調查一定是類似的客訴出現才會開
點一下我給的那個網站document search,
你就會看到有17例客訴和內容
investigation成立之後, 過了一段時間才會有engineering analysis
在這個之前當然可以"自主性"召回, 然後case就closed了
以台灣太古的DSG為例, 目前也還在調查階段, 然後太古"自主性"召回
結論報告也還沒出來啊, 請問一下差異在那裡?
個人積分：124分
文章編號：43152718
krispykremeII wrote:
對了我在送給你一個更...(恕刪)
你這個例子並沒有進到recall的階段, 而是NHTSA決定進行工程分析
工程分析的結果是沒有安全疑慮, 也無需召回
Passat起火調查結果
個人積分：64分
文章編號：43152763
yenchee wrote:
我想是你不知道NHTSA介入吧, 隨便一個人介入NHTSA就開investigation
那大概就調查不完了, NHTSA開調查一定是類似的客訴出現才會開
點一下我給的那個網站document search,
你就會看到有17例客訴和內容
investigation成立之後, 過了一段時間才會有engineering analysis
在這個之前當然可以"自主性"召回, 然後case就closed了
以台灣太古的DSG為例, 目前也還在調查階段, 然後太古"自主性"召回
結論報告也還沒出來啊, 請問一下差異在那裡?
錯
並不是所有的案件都會有 Engineering Analysis
而且也不是所有的問題零件會招回
拿你的 Passat 來講
NHTSA 證實你的車點火線圈會有著火問題
但因為火勢可以維持在引擎室
對駕駛不會造成安全性問題
所以沒有招回
http://blogs.automotive.com/nhtsa-closes-vw-passat-engine-fire-investigation-without-issuing-recall-84013.html
最後補上一個只有 Investigation 卻沒有受理案件
NHTSA ID Number: 10206582
Date Complaint Filed: 10/22/2007
Component(s): AIR BAGS Date of Incident: 09/26/2007
NHTSA ID Number: 10206582
All Products Associated with this Complaint
Details
0 Associated Documents
Crash:No Fire:No Number of Injuries:0 Number of Deaths:0
Manufacturer: Honda (American Honda Motor Co.)
Vehicle Identification No. (VIN): Not Available
SUMMARY:
I OWN A 2000 ACURA INTEGRA (BOUGHT BRAND NEW FROM A DEARLERSHIP IN NJ) TOWARDS THE END OF 2000. I FEEL QUITE STRONGLY THAT MANY ACURA MODELS HAVE DEFECTS WITH THEIR "SRS LIGHTS" COMING ON UNEXPECTEDLY ON AUTOMOBILES. LAST YEAR, THE SRS LIGHT CAME ON AND I WAS TOLD I NEEDED A CLOCK SPRING WHICH WAS REPLACED. THIS YEAR, THE SRS LIGHT CAME BACK ON AND I WAS TOLD THAT I NEEDED A NEW PASSENGER SIDE AIRBAG. THIS WAS TOTALLY A SHOCK TO ME SINCE I THOUGHT THAT AIRBAGS ARE USUALLY REPLACED WHEN THEY ARE DAMAGED IN AN AUTO ACCIDENT OR AFTER THEY ARE DEPLOYED. I HAD THE AIRBAG REPLACED AND IT COST OVER A THOUSAND DOLLARS TO DO SO. I HAD CONTACTED MY INSURANCE AGENT AND WAS INFORMED THAT HE HAD NEVER HEARD OF AN AIRBAG BEING REPLACED OUT OF THE CLEAR BLUE SKY. AFTER THE AIRBAG WAS REPLACED, I REQUESTED FROM THE DEALERSHIP THAT I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE THE AIRBAG THAT WAS REMOVED FROM MY CAR TO HAVE IT INSPECTED INDEPENDENTLY AND WAS TOLD THAT I COULD NOT TAKE IT SINCE THEY HAVE TO DISPOSE OF IT THEMSELVES FOR SAFETY REASONS. I NOTICED IN DOING SOME OF MY OWN RESEARCH THAT SRS LIGHTS COMING ON QUITE A BIT IN ACURA'S AND IT IS DEFINITELY A COMPLAINT FROM MANY CUSTOMERS AND THIS INFO CAN BE FOUND BY DOING A GOOGLE SEARCH. I ALSO NOTICED THAT THERE WAS A RECALL (02V196) ON THE 2001 ACURA INTEGRA MODEL WITH DESCRIPTION "PASSENGER AIRBAG MODULES WERE TO PROPERLY WELDED AND MAY NOT DEPLOY IN A COLLISION". I TRIED CONTACTING ACURA DIRECTLY VIA LETTER AND PHONE AND TO NO AVAIL. THEY ARE UNCOOPERATIVE. I WOULD LIKE AN INVESTIGATION ON THIS MATTER SINCE ITS MIND-BOGGLING TO ACCEPT THE FACT THAT AN AIRBAG NEEDED TO BE REPLACED OUT OF THE BLUE AND CONSIDERING THE NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS BY CAR OWNERS OF ACURA MODELS, ITS NOT DIFFICULT TO BELIEVE THAT THIS COULD VERY WELL BE A MANUFACTURING DEFECT. PERHAPS A COMPONENT RATHER THAN A WHOLE BAG NEEDED REPLACEMENT. PLEASE ASSIST ME WITH THIS MATTER SINCE YOU ARE MY ONLY HOPE TO SOLVE THIS UNFORTUNATE MATTER. *TR
個人積分：64分
文章編號：43152808
