求求您! if you see my dog please kindly contact with me

還能上來貼法律條文
代表並不是沒辦法上網跟進這個討論

有時間上來嗆聲說要告人
卻不願意更改標題與首篇文章
NIKE小姐仍然被你貼著"疑似偷狗賊"的標籤

再強調一遍:
修改一下標題跟首篇的內文是很困難嗎?
好心的NIKE小姐這種疑似偷狗賊的標籤還要被你貼多久啊?

lav1147 wrote:
雖然樓主的回應的確很不應該

不過也請不要做人身攻擊...


說真的~這棟樓砲火比我猛的大有人在~

你只選擇對我說~有意義嗎?!


masterindjlo wrote:
,司法院三十年院字第...(恕刪)

我記得不是你自己說你自己重症的嗎??我們只是照你的話說,所以我們都滿體恤你的啊...只是不知你是何種重症就是....腦殘?精神分裂?躁慾症?被害忘想症?
我都是疑問句哦...可別對號入座.
不管什麼重症,總之你自己就是說你得了重症....還是祝你早日康復

masterindjlo wrote:
,司法院三十年院字第...台灣是民主國家
所以請翻一下法典,在砲轟(恕刪)




「抗告」是當事人或證人、鑑定人、通譯等其他受法院裁定之人,對下級法院的裁定不服,直接向上級法院請求廢棄或撤銷原裁定的救濟程序。

抗告雖然與上訴相同,是一種就下級法院的裁判對上級法院聲明不服的方法,但是抗告是針對中間裁判(裁定,)而上訴是針對終局裁判(判決。)

依刑事訴訟法403條規定,當事人對於法院裁定如有不服,除有特別規定,得抗告於直接上級法院,我國依現行法規定,得提起「抗告權人」分為當事人與非當事人2種,並不以當事人為限。從當事人(包括檢察官、自訴人及被告),到非當事人例如證人、鑑定、通譯及其他非當事人受裁定者的訴訟關係人,均可提起抗告。


台灣是個教育普及的國家
所以請了解"抗告"語詞原意,
切莫不懂裝懂貽笑大方...
提告抗告傻傻分不清楚


masterindjlo wrote:
,司法院三十年院字第...(恕刪)


你翻出來的法則 是在指未具體事實

重點 是你的態度有問題 好嗎?

人家好心幫你 你還回人家什麼話

只能說好心被雷劈

你等著看好了...下次你狗在不見 我看會不會有人幫你找......

01的網友 很會翻東西的



I did thank you already, however, I have told the true to you

yes, she is very kind lady who helped me and found my dog

and what did she expect


telling the whole world the she is "such a great wonman"

and this is not the first time I said thank you to her already.

However, who is the one keep this on going

What does she really want?

The first thing that she said to me last night, is : take the dog away.

People always see the true from the surface.

However, please mind my wording, if what she describe, my dog was almost crashed by the car? Can anyone provide evidence?

What is the true to you?

Again, I really thank her for her action to pick up my dog, however, who has thought of the consequence?

I have to said that its my bad that I didn't put the dog plate for my dog or didn't watch by carefully, However, for the chip, I can't accept it, have you guys actually see the niddle?

I have to say this, we do need kindness people. and yes, she has total no responsibility to do anything for me or the dog, so I thank her for that. I am not take it for grant it. I told her "Thank you very much" not more than three times already.

If she thing the wording title is too strong, let me know what should I do? All my information from that night is from other shop owners, police and they made the conclusion like this.

But would any one understand when you lost something and you have no clue to found it?

I knew that there must be tapo in this post, and you guys will pick up this and fight till, you are the world ploice or this is one of the greatest headline in the world.

believe it or not I can't really type Chinese, I need penpower to write, I am not showing off for that but using English will be better to express my feeling

kk1332 wrote:
樓主,人家幫你找回了...(恕刪)
,司法院三十年院字第二一七九號解釋認為「刑法上之公然侮辱罪,祗須侮辱行為足使不特定人或多數人得以共見共聞,即行成立(參照院字第二○三三號解釋),不以侮辱時被害人在場聞見為要件,又某甲對多數人罵乙女為娼,如係意圖散布於眾而指摘或傳述其為娼之具體事實,自應成立刑法第三百十條第一項之誹謗罪,倘僅漫罵為娼,並未指有具體事實,仍屬公然侮辱,應依同法第三百零九條第一項論科」,易言之,不指摘事實而公然侮弄辱罵特定人或可得推知之人,構成公然侮辱罪,若指摘或傳述足以損害他人名譽之具體事件內容,則構成誹謗罪。

台灣是民主國家
所以請翻一下法典,在砲轟


SaTiQ1220 wrote:
嘻嘻 我覺得可以進...(恕刪)
,司法院三十年院字第二一七九號解釋認為「刑法上之公然侮辱罪,祗須侮辱行為足使不特定人或多數人得以共見共聞,即行成立(參照院字第二○三三號解釋),不以侮辱時被害人在場聞見為要件,又某甲對多數人罵乙女為娼,如係意圖散布於眾而指摘或傳述其為娼之具體事實,自應成立刑法第三百十條第一項之誹謗罪,倘僅漫罵為娼,並未指有具體事實,仍屬公然侮辱,應依同法第三百零九條第一項論科」,易言之,不指摘事實而公然侮弄辱罵特定人或可得推知之人,構成公然侮辱罪,若指摘或傳述足以損害他人名譽之具體事件內容,則構成誹謗罪。

台灣是民主國家
所以請翻一下法典,在砲轟



艾喫基魔人 wrote:
哈哈哈~!這兩個回文...(恕刪)
I though you guys write the scrip isn't it?

any of this is your business?
傻瓜狐狸 wrote:
腦羞成怒???力戰群...(恕刪)

欠人的傢伙~還不快一點還人家~~妳這輩子不還~~下輩子也要還~~快還人家吧~~!!

少在那邊裝要告人的樣子~~我告訴你~老子跟你卯上了!!
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 22)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!