我就是愛拍照 wrote:
HTZ 我覺得到下次財報前,低點$5.5~$5.8 有機會看到。
高點$7 也有可能再碰到。
我還是等$5.9再來買比較爽。


今天盤後是AMD的法說會,
所以早上看了些網路上AMD的閒聊,
其中某位AMD大神談到他的投資:

Let's review previous FAD LTFM CAGRs:

2015: "Return to profitability in H2", followed by "consistent" and "improved" profitability. Despite having been a significant AMD investor since 1998, in 2015, having picked up "The Scent of Zen", I backed up the truck.

這些說法和HTZ那天在財報時的說法也滿接近的。
本來想把HTZ放一放的,看來還是要再持續研究一下HTZ。

把線圖拉出來,搞清楚上次大漲是為了什麼:


看日期是4/16/2025
查了一下新聞,原來是Bill Ackman 公佈了他的持股。
而且他居然還為了HTZ,向SEC申請延遲公告。
持股比例達到20%。
看起來他的成本應該在 $4元上下。

HTZ 目前市值20億美元,而股價$4元時,市值大約13億,
所以Ackman大概才投了2.6億美元。
對他185億的基金規模來說應該也不算什麼。

照他的說法:
1。關稅使車價上升,HTZ手上120億的車子升值了大概12億。
2。HTZ的經營目標是一台車一個月營收$1500,拆舊$300
3。目標股價 $30

$30 比我之前瞎猜的要高得多。不過他是看到2028/2029。
這也難說誰比較樂觀一點,看起來差不太多。

我認為明年Q1大概可能要先跌回去$5.5,甚到破 $5,
年中最多能摸到$8,年底前大概高點最多$10。

當然,HTZ的問題也還是很多:
1。負債高,淨值是負的
2。商譽為負向的,很多客戶覺得服務品質比不上Enterprise
3。競爭者不少:TURO(今年上市失敗),Uber/Lift這些其實也吃掉一些市場。

至於一些幻想/機會:
1。買下TURO (不太可能,沒錢,除非找到金主,如Ackman)
2。再和TSLA合作搞自動駕駛的出租車。TSLA如果真的要搞RoboTaxi,最終可能還是需要門市來處理合約/維修/充電等等的工作。HTZ如今會這樣,就和之前買太多TSLA電動車有關,所以對TSLA車子的保養維修也是最有經驗的公司

其實外在因素講再多,最重要的成敗還是在經營團隊手上。
目前看起來狀況還可以,Q3至少是轉虧為盈了。
如果能只比Ackman多付20%的成本,這買賣還是很可以的。
$5上下應該可以用力賭一把。
風險與機會並存吧,
想賺十倍,必然也有十倍風險。

Ackman 完整的理論在這裡:https://x.com/BillAckman/status/1912955549542744462?lang=en

Why does Bill Ackman like Hertz stock?

Ackman often posts long-form essays on social media to explain the rationale behind a particular Pershing Square investment. When it comes to Hertz, he sees the current tariff situation as an under-recognized tailwind for the company. Let's break down the math to better understand Ackman's logic.

Hertz operates a fleet of roughly 500,000 vehicles with an estimated value of $12 billion. Assuming that President Donald Trump's tariffs lead to an increase of 10% in used car prices, then Hertz's fleet essentially would gain $1.2 billion in value. That would be more than half of the entire current market value of the company.

Some notable assumptions about the future are built into Ackman's long-term forecast. At a high level, he is aligned with Hertz management's guidance that it will be able to generate $1,500 in revenue per vehicle per month, while maintaining its depreciation per unit in the range of $300 per car per month. These metrics are only modestly better than what Hertz is achieving today -- suggesting these targets are within reach.

Ackman suggests that by 2029, Hertz could be generating $2 billion in annual adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). By applying an EBITDA multiple of 7.5, Ackman derives a value of $15 billion for Hertz -- equating to a share price of about $30.
我就是愛拍照 wrote:
今天盤後是AMD的法...(恕刪)


FYI





tcwu
HTZ連1%都沒有[冷]
我就是愛拍照
HTZ有311M 股在流通,所以15M股,在比例上算起來好像才5%,而非20%,但看那個趨勢圖好像又沒有減持。所以應該不是直接持股到20%。成本$3.5,比我猜的低很多,看來佈局很久了。
草民看不懂什麼是 "total return swaps"




查一下:

A total return swap (TRS) is a derivative contract where one party (the "total return receiver") pays the total return of a reference asset to the other party (the "total return payer"), who pays a fixed or floating rate in return. The total return includes any income generated by the asset (like interest or dividends) plus or minus any capital gains or losses. A TRS allows the receiver to gain synthetic exposure to the asset without actually owning it, while the payer can hedge its risk or generate income.


Example

1。A hedge fund (receiver) enters a TRS with a bank (payer) to get exposure to a bond portfolio.
2。The hedge fund pays the bank a floating interest rate.
3。The bank passes on all interest payments from the bond portfolio and any capital appreciation to the hedge fund.
4。If the bond portfolio's value decreases, the hedge fund must pay the bank the amount of the loss.


看來是為了上槓桿,順便躲一下F13報告。
Q1和Q2的平均價大都在$3.5以上不少,
多數在$3.8-$4。能保持在$3.56真是厲害。
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 505)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!