坐等後續,不過如果事主只有挑釁沒動手
法理上還是UBER司機站不住腳

卡一個後續
案情不單純
想知道後續卡一個

不過最近Uber新聞很多
希望不要被政府給弄走
單面之詞,難以全面採信
事情經過恐非如此單純

讓我們繼續看下去
因工作關係常乘坐計程車,一年乘坐次數大概有200趟~
雖然不是每次都是電話或在小7叫車,但大多都是選擇最「大」的車行,印象中沒有這麼不好的經驗~
這位大大可以多分享這個案例的過程嗎~

tushiou01 wrote:
這都是機率問題。
我自己的經驗是55688或55178遇到鳥事的機率遠大於UBER,又比較貴。

最誇張的是有次叫計程車,說5分鐘後到,等了15分鐘沒到,打給計程車客服結果被嗆「不爽等不要叫車啊」,然後直接被掛電話。
有上新聞嗎??樹大必有枯枝,人多必有白癡
相比較而言我覺得比小黃素質高太多了
可能這動手的是個例吧,沒前後因果實在很難知道真相
不可以打人,打人是不對的

不知道有沒有機會讓另一方說明一下

我也覺得就版主的說法,駕駛應該是有嚴重的情緒失調

但這是板主的說法

andyxxx wrote:
因工作關係常乘坐計...(恕刪)


1.短程不載,上車後開始碎念沒賺錢
2.廣播很大聲,硬要說話題(通常是政治 然後一直罵)
3.沿路亂切車,油門煞車猛採,甚至闖紅燈
4.嘴巴很髒,看到警察就罵
5.車上異味,硬推銷一些傳單
6.帶狗嫌掉毛
7.有電子支付不收 只收現金
8.繞路、跳錶動手腳,每天坐多少錢都知道 怎遇到你就翻倍
9.態度很差,下車說謝謝 也不鳥人
10.開車玩手機看影片
實在太多 一時說不完
Leonarka wrote:
但最大問題就是在台灣被法條跟計程車排擠

只有台灣的法條與Uber有衝突嗎?
只有台灣的計程車司機排擠Uber嗎?

在他的發源地美國也一樣,在許多州都與當地各種勞工法規,與職業駕駛法規有牴觸.
http://time.com/3924941/uber-california-labor-commission-ruling/

This week a ruling from the California Labor Commission was made public because popular ride-sourcing company Uber appealed it. A San Francisco-based driver named Barbara Ann Berwick brought a case alleging that she is an employee, not an independent contractor as Uber claims. It emerged that the commission ruled in her favor, saying the company owed her $4,152 in expenses. But this could lead to rulings worth much more.

Uber在許多國家都與現行職業駕駛管理規定有所牴觸.

在新加坡,Uber是被新加坡政府勒令關閉,不准營業.
https://coconuts.co/singapore/news/uber-cease-singapore-operations-may-7/
Savor this weekend, Singaporeans. This is your last weekend with Uber.

After five years, the U.S.-based ride-hailing app is set to cease all its operations in Singapore on Monday, May 7, completing the buy out made earlier this year by competitor Grab.

In a statement issued by Uber on Saturday, it says “The Uber app will cease to operate in Singapore after 7 May in accordance with directions from the Competition and Consumer Commission (CCCS) of Singapore.”


Uber was originally scheduled to stop its operations on April 15, but the termination was postponed due to a CCCS review of the Grab-Uber deal.

While the CCCS stands firm on Uber’s cessation in Singapore, the commission also admits that not all investigations will be completed by May 7.
有的人很好笑

如果是小黃,不分青紅皂白馬上就展開地圖砲攻擊,把所有小黃摻在一起罵

換成是UBER,卻是先卡看後續,自動歸類成個人行為,UBER好棒棒

明明一樣都是老鼠屎,一鍋香又甜,一鍋髒又臭
追蹤一下後續處理結果
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 55)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!