自動剎車系統各品牌的比較.....

tri wrote:
片長4:53秒不是嘛...(恕刪)

大大真是高手,佩服、佩服。
光用看影片就比其他人還用聽的好太多了。
給你
也謝謝開版大分享這影片。
要真有興趣, 可以翻閱原文報告, 德文

Comparison test of emergency braking

綜合成績: Volvo V60 D5 AWD Geartronic > Mercedes CLS 350 CGI > Audi A7 3,0 TFSI > VW Passat Variant 2,0 TFSI DSG > BMW 530d Automatik > Infiniti M37S Premium

1. Ride on slower-moving object: VOLVO = VW > MB > AUDI > BMW > INFINITI
2. Ride on a constant object delay: AUDI > MB > VOLVO > VW > BMW > INFINITI
3. Driving on suspended object: MB > VOLVO > VM > BMW = INFINITI > AUDI
4. Ride on stationary object: VOLVO >> INFINITI > MB > VW > BMW >> AUDI
5. Warning cascade: AUDI > VW > VOLVO = MB > BMW > INFINITI

加分題
1. Brake support: VOLVO = MB = AUDI = VW > BMW = INFINITI
2. Distance Warning: VOLVO = MB = INFINITI > AUDI = VW
3. Acceptance: MB = AUDI = VW > VOLVO = BMW > INFINITI

評語
(用 GOOGLE 翻譯直譯)
The Volvo V60 wins the comparison and the only receives a very good review.
The automatic braking just before a collision reduces amount of impact energy, thereby
The severity is mitigated. The City Safety system can operate at low
Even completely avoid collisions city speeds. Also convinced the
Swede with his good collision warning.
The following places went to the Mercedes CLS and Audi A7. Both rely on
goals before a collision moving independently from extremely good speed. the
Mercedes brakes even on stationary targets, but can not avoid collisions. the
Audi enabled on stationary targets, the brake can not autonomously, but with the
best alarm cascade in the test to convince. Both manufacturers have already announced another
Stage of its emergency brake on, which then also kollisionsvermeidend
can intervene.

The VW Passat does not allow any real weaknesses, but not as much speed collision
that degrade e.g. Mercedes or Audi. Is on stationary targets by the
autonomous braking contrast to 30 km / h on a collision avoided.
The BMW 5 Series reached just as the last-placed Infiniti M is the overall rating of "satisfactory".
Both build on the autonomous operation by little speed. the
Collision warning in the Infiniti is also ineffective. As an innovation of the Japanese but offers
an active gas pedal, which contributes to the driver tailgating a backpressure
attention makes. Unfortunately, there is something lacking in fine-tuning
whereby the pedal can be annoying quickly.
Volvo感覺蠻好的!
stevenlake wrote:
大大真是高手,佩服、...(恕刪)
molyhu0121 wrote:
我很慶幸我加入了VOLVO
尤其以這樣的價格...(恕刪)


說到價格, ADAC 報告裡也把價格寫上

VOLVO V60 45500 歐元 (基本) + 1700 歐元 (緊急煞車系統)
Mercedes CLS 350 BlueEfficiency 64.617 + 4.641
Audi A7 3,0 TFSI quattro 58.600 + 4.120
VW Passat Variant 2,0 TFSI DSG Highline 37.775 + 1.195
BMW 530d Automatik 49.500 + 5.140
Infiniti M37S Premium 62.100 + 0

V60 D5 AWD 都快和 BMW 530d 差不多價錢
以至於... 每次看到 x 德心裡就有氣
感謝yenchee 提供的資料,就可以印證影片裡面提到的低速A車撞擊的問題

他說只有聲音提示,但剎車沒有自動動作

所以猜測應該是沒有踩剎車下測試的

絲逸歡 wrote:
印證影片裡面提到的低速A車撞擊的問題 ...(恕刪)


Audi 的問題可以參考書面報告.
在 B3, B4 測試都是最後一名, 其中 B4 蠻慘的, 還好那只佔 20% 的分數

看完影片,感覺自動煞車系統沒我想像完美

volvo的自動煞車系統比較接近我所認知(但感覺仍不夠完美)

其他幾款好像都還是會撞上,看來自動煞車系統還有很大進步空間

yuki59 wrote:
看完影片,感覺自動煞車系統沒我想像完美...(恕刪)


這本來就不是簡單的事呀

僅管如此, 換個方向想, IIHS 的報告可以參考

AVOID CRASHES

簡單摘要一下:

XC60 的 City Safety 有效避免車禍衝撞 27%
(其它廠牌也有相關資料)

那些保險公司精得很, 這些車禍事件都是直接影響他們的穫利, 當然也直接影響車主的荷包

個人是比較欣賞 VOLVO, 因為它特別加強行人, 除了保護行人, 真的也保護自己的荷包
(撞到人粉麻煩地...)

alanyeh wrote:
會這樣說表示你沒開過...(恕刪)


1. 我的回應沒有否定這個系統

2. 只是說明駕駛人還是整個控制的主動方,該如何提升駕駛的能力、道德與技術比較重要。

以酒醉、疲勞駕駛來說,這本身就是駕駛員要告訴自己不應該這樣做,讓主動煞車系統救了一命又怎樣?
難保哪天系統突然因一些機械因素、老化、干擾?造成非預期的狀況出現,失去保護。

3. 技術與科技的發明與量產提高人們的方便都是好的,但人們往往會過於習慣與依賴。


osla wrote:
1. 我的回應沒有否...(恕刪)


就 IIHS 統計美國幾個大城市的狀況, 有這些主動安全裝置, 的確顯著地降低了一些事故
財產損失責任少了 27%
人身傷害責任少了 51%
碰撞少了 22%
(以上是 VOLVO XC60數據)

至於您說的依賴... 的確也是啦! 這個就留到以後去評價吧

文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!