這篇有在電腦音效那邊 可是因為只有兩個人回應 故來這邊重發

MyAV 跟AA我知道都是很多資訊的論壇

但是覺得裡面的人沒十萬的喇叭就不是喇叭的感覺 ..

現有設備是 LOGIC A-35 喇叭是diamond10.1

預算約4k~5k 想增加音樂的細節

主要用途還是電腦主機撥放音樂 (FLAC APE 音樂CD )

各位大大會建議是徵張二手的Xonar Essence STX

還是找台4~5K的DAC呢 (這方面有請大大推薦)

是直接用電腦內建的數位輸出給dac嗎?

以4~5千元dac跟Xonar Essence STX來選擇
Xonar Essence STX有類比兩聲道輸出,支援asio及依靠外接電源去驅動
個人建議可先入手Xonar Essence STX 用類比兩聲道輸出可能就比4~5千元dac好
如以後要加購dac時Xonar Essence STX也有數位輸出(而且數位輸出品質一定比電腦內建音效好)
建議直上DAC吧
數位輸出主板上的跟音效卡的差不了多少(一說沒差別)
但是DAC就差別很大了

den770626 wrote:
是直接用電腦內建的數...(恕刪)


我不清楚數位還是什麼的 ..

現在是有一條3.5 to RCA給a-35去推喇叭

感謝提議


richkao wrote:
建議直上DAC吧
數...(恕刪)


想請問我都是聽音樂 (抒情歌曲居多)

會建議哪一台呢?
並不是若有神仙可作,誰願當畜牲的問題,

音響我覺得學生及年輕人的玩法,就是一堆小錢一堆一堆X100個一堆.............耳擴,土砲,DAC,小管機,音效卡,Z5500等...

不是說不能這樣玩,這東西的底線就是這樣而已了,也不是正道。
自己的心情要保持愉快從中獲得樂趣,若老是拿來跟正規的路線來比較,不是自尋煩惱嗎

大家步入中壯年後都有手頭寬裕的一天,等到位後,就沒有這些困擾了,樓主你今天還是不要想太多,你的音樂已經很好聽了不是嗎
熊順發 wrote:
這篇有在電腦音效那邊...(恕刪)


我會建議購買Asus Xonar Essence STX。

DAC是數位類比轉換器,訊源還是音效卡阿,音效卡等級影響會比DAC來的直接跟明顯。

Asus這張音色較冷偏解析,很符合您的需求。

胖仔叔叔 wrote:


我會建議購買As...(恕刪)


感謝建議 另外想問的是 10.1給我的感覺是較溫暖的聲音

若音效卡是偏冷的 會不會變的很奇怪阿 ( 冷 暖? )

謝謝您喔



570 wrote:
並不是若有神仙可作,...(恕刪)


感謝大大 我聽過Z-5500 自己也是Z-4換上來的 音樂確實佔據生活一個很重的部分 (幾乎一直開著 直到睡覺)

而因為我當學生還會有很長的一段時間 也許一套好用的我可以用上好幾年 到沒辦法改變了也會停止

還是感謝建議 謝謝。
STX我用過,用了三個月就丟二手急著出清,原因是聲音冷太偏解析不耐聽,雖然規格開很漂亮很多人背書但聽久了就是感覺有點毛躁不討喜,耳擴可以推的強而有力但是有推的不夠好的感覺.現在用USB DAC覺得聲音圓潤稍厚有韻味,放著音樂慢慢聽感覺比較輕鬆沒負擔.
doch wrote:
STX我用過,用了三...(恕刪)


想請問大大用的是哪一台DAC呢
我想您應該還不了解Xonar Essence STX的風評
我常到101的PAGEONE買英文的音響雜誌, 今年一月看到封面居然是來自我們台灣華碩的Xonar, 真是感動到不行, 簡單的說, 他評論這是一張真正能將電腦變成HIFI的最划算方案

我自己年初買了一張, 真的覺得... 有沒有這麼值回票價的東西啊, 我的USHER本來筧得很好的了, 現在又更升級了一整個層次...



如果一個平常都評幾千美金東西的主編說這個真的不錯, 我想, 是真的不錯吧

Google了一下, 有人把部份內文給key了出來, 有興趣就看看吧
http://www.hifivision.com/amplifiers/4666-xonar-essence-stx-built-headphone-amplifier.html

Originally Posted by John Atkinson. Stereophile Jan 2010, Pages 74 to 83
It was apparent that the Xonar Essence’s analogue outputs offered serious sound quality. The DVD-A of Neil Young's Harvest (Reprise 48100-9) drew me into the music, and the blend of James Taylor's and Linda’s Ronstadt's voices behind Young on "Heart of Gold" was well delineated without obscuring individuality of their sounds.

Returning to the listening chair, low frequencies had suitable impact and weight, the midrange was uncolored, with excellent clarity, and the high frequencies sounded very clean, with good air around sound sources. In Joni Mitchell's "On France They Kiss On Main Street" (from Shadows and Light Asylum 704-2), the cymbals had an excellent combination of sheen and sizzle without the latter being unnaturally emphasized -although, of course, the HDCD coding was not being applied. And on "The Dry Cleaner Des Moines," Jaco Pastoriu's display of Walking-bass virtuosity Fretless Fender was reproduced with authority, as was Don Alias's kick drum: The balance between the "pat" of the drum-head transient and the "purr" the subsequent body tone was well managed.

The same was true of a 24/96 piano recording I made at the beginning of November for a live-vs-recorded demonstration organized by Philip O’Hanlon of Luxman and Vivid distributor On A Higher Note (see Stereophile: Live Versus Recorded). I had to record a little closer/drier than was optimal, so that the double hit of the same acoustic was not too disturbing on playback. But the Xonar Essence did a great job of conveying the full weight of the Steinway D as pianist Genadi Zagor pounded it's left-hand keys at the climax of Mussorgsky's Pictures at an Exhibition.

The Xonar Essence STX was doing sterling work for my everyday listening. How would it stack up against other Computer-audio solutions?
關閉廣告
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!