小仲 wrote:
把這篇文章標題改成

尼斯有沒有辦法抵抗飽和攻擊

我覺得比較會有答案 哈哈哈 ...(恕刪)

目前看來快抵檔不住了...
我都看懂了談什麼,怎麼這麼多人看不懂
美國就是要北韓上勾,引他出來打...美國就算轟炸了北韓也未必就能贏得勝利...怕

又陷入以前韓戰或之前打阿富汗的窘境..

小仲 wrote:
把這篇文章標題改成

尼斯有沒有辦法抵抗飽和攻擊

我覺得比較會有答案 哈哈哈
(恕刪)


你壞壞喔
無視大法 vs 專業軍事迷的飽和攻擊

說真的
這棟樓是閒聊版中
非常專業的文章之一
niniline1999 wrote:
二次大戰航空母艦不就...(恕刪)

問題是二戰時,沒有神盾艦啊....
學學W鋼彈的希洛吧
按下自爆鍵就結了.....


USS Cole bombing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing

The destroyer's rules of engagement, as approved by the Pentagon, kept its guards from firing upon the small boat (unknowingly loaded with explosives) as it neared them without first obtaining permission from the Cole's captain or another officer.

Petty Officer John Washak said that right after the blast, a senior chief petty officer ordered him to turn an M-60 machine gun on the Cole's fantail away from a second small boat approaching. "With blood still on my face," he said, he was told: "That's the rules of engagement: no shooting unless we're shot at." He added, "In the military, it's like we're trained to hesitate now. If somebody had seen something wrong and shot, he probably would have been court-martialed." Petty Officer Jennifer Kudrick said that if the sentries had fired on the suicide craft "we would have gotten in more trouble for shooting two foreigners than losing seventeen American sailors."

This incident is only meant for situation analysis. Of course, as to the real application - the only limitation is your imagination!
The Russian anti-ship missile we have no defense against?
http://www.metafilter.com/88559/The-Russian-antiship-missile-we-have-no-defense-against

January 23, 2010 3:26 PM
SS-N-22 Sunburn is the NATO designation for a Russian-made anti-ship missile that the US Navy (it seems) currently has no defense against.

Many years ago, Soviet planners gave up trying to match the US Navy ship for ship, gun for gun, and dollar for dollar. The Soviets simply could not compete with the high levels of US spending required to build up and maintain a huge naval armada. They shrewdly adopted an alternative approach based on strategic defense. They searched for weaknesses, and sought relatively inexpensive ways to exploit those weaknesses. The Soviets succeeded: by developing several supersonic anti-ship missiles, one of which, the SS-N-22 Sunburn, has been called “the most lethal missile in the world today...

As we learned in the Falklands war -- missles are cheaper than men.
posted by effugas at 3:32 PM on January 23

There are no invincible defense system in the real world.

The destroyer HMS SHEFFIELD on fire after being struck by an AM39 Exocet missile fired by an Argentine aircraft


By the way, even if the nuke warhead miss its target, the strong EMP emitted by the nuke can still burn through most of the modern electronic components. Under such condition (serious EMP strike), most of the modern fly-by-wire aircrafts probably will fall from the sky.

BSA wrote:
The Russia...(恕刪)

你翻成中文吧,
這裡認為航空母艦是無敵艦隊的太多了.
航母,本身防空能力就不強,

它就是一個飛機平台,

所以,才要神盾等等的護衛艦來保護

航母本身的設計就是要裝載飛機來進行攻擊

如果硬是要說北韓能一下升空二百台戰機,

都裝好了反艦飛彈的話,

單單航母反擊,因該是_有機會_打爆航母的,

航母大約二分鐘能彈射四台戰機,

五百海浬飛到航母面前要多久呢?小弟不知


不過~~大大,航母真的不可能單獨行動的

這次還是有四艘神盾,北韓的飛機要靠近航母,機率真的太低了

它,不是 無敵艦隊 但它,一定是一個非常強的艦隊~~

整個航母的艦隊~不是那麼簡單的啦
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 58)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!