成大在美告蘋果Siri侵犯專利權

竟然有律師說免費!
只要打勝了抽成,表示這個是有勝算的
有把握就盡量告!

現在國際大廠打官司是沒在客氣的。

告贏了反而證明台灣有實力。

現在廠商做生意都很野蠻,沒本事被呼兩巴掌也只是剛剛好而已。

台灣沈淪現在開始 wrote:
竟然有律師說免費!只...(恕刪)



當然要來這套...

1.為何打贏才抽成,打輸免費!!

ANS : 此官司如果打起來,賠償金額絕對是天價,如前幾樓大大所示,抽成%數,遠比一開始授權打官司的費用高上許多,沒有什麼贏面很大的勝率,不管打贏、打輸,律師絕對知名度提升,變向的是替自己打廣告,這是一件國際觀注的訴案,打知名度的速度很快,富界人士很快就會流傳,生意不會只有這一筆。
告死他

亂發一堆專利 又亂告人 根本就是他阻礙科技發展,


kenchu1109 wrote:
人家要告是人家的事也...(恕刪)


如果成大是告三星,一定一堆人對成大歌功頌德一番,態度肯定完全不一樣。
可惜是告蘋果,還要被酸是為了成名或者是學校沒錢。
如果成大沒錢,那台灣有四分之三的大學都可以倒了。
說實在SIRI技術又不是apple 都馬是買來的
和s voice還有LG 那個都是同技術

raymondlee wrote:
至少那位教授已經成名...(恕刪)

可見你不在這個領域
只是鍵盤手
你知道那位教授有什麼頭銜嗎?
IEEE Fellow
你去查台灣有幾位教授可以得到這個國際頭銜
在國外早就很有名了
通常這種教授事情都很多
才懶得拿專利去告人
這次是旁人察覺到
才去告的

sentinels wrote:
可見你不在這個領域只...(恕刪)


有哪篇文不是用鍵盤打出來的??????????

Fellow又怎樣 還不是得吃飯大便一天24H

準備好椅子來看看 最後會被怎樣搓圓仔湯嚕
免責聲明:說的話都不算喔 啾咪~>_ ^
ulyssesric wrote:
你還是沒搞懂。「語音...(恕刪)

大家來K書吧
主要claim如下
要吵的人先把這些K過再說
有誰專攻語音辨識???教一下吧
.............
Claims
1. A method for matching speech data used to determine the similarity between an input speech data and a sample speech data, the method comprising:

segmenting the input speech data into a plurality of input speech frames;
segmenting the sample speech data into a plurality of sample speech frames;
building a matching matrix, wherein each element of the matching matrix corresponds to one of the input speech frames and one of the sample speech frames and indicates a distance value between the corresponding input speech frame and the corresponding sample speech frame;
determining a minimum value of the distance values indicated in each row of elements of the matching matrix, thereby obtaining a plurality of minimum distance values of the respective rows of elements of the matching matrix, determining a second least value of the distance values indicated in each row of elements of the matching matrix, thereby obtaining a plurality of second least distance values of the respective rows of elements of the matching matrix;
summing up the minimum distance values and the second least distance value of the distance values indicated in each row of elements of the matching matrix, thereby obtaining a row score, determined by:
row score = ∑ j = 1 r min r ⊗ C [ MM ( i , j ) ] + ∑ j = 1 r min r ⊗ C - i c [ MM ( i , j ) ] ;
determining a minimum value of the distance values indicated in each column of elements of the matching matrix, thereby obtaining a plurality of another minimum distance values of the respective columns of elements of the matching matrix, determining a second least value of the distance values indicated in each column of elements of the matching matrix, thereby obtaining a plurality of second least distance values of the respective columns of elements of the matching matrix;
summing up the another minimum distance values and the second least value of the indicated distance values in each column of elements of the matching matrix distance values, thereby obtaining a column score, wherein:
column score = ∑ i = 1 e min j ∈ R [ MM ( i , j ) ] + ∑ i = 1 e min j ∈ R - j k [ MM ( i , j ) ] ;
calculating a matching score obtained by combining the distance row score and the column score; and
determining whether the input speech data and the sample speech data are similar according to the matching score.

ulyssesric wrote:
你還是沒搞懂。

「...(恕刪)


這一篇把專利訴訟的核心問題點出來了, 還有深入淺出的舉例, 可惜看的懂上位觀念的少, 護衛的跟看熱鬧的居多啊!
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 15)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!