喜滿客CINE X 即將襲捲南台灣!

完整的全文:(或可跳看結論,在最後兩行)


Ok now to the RealD 3D XD viewing. One word. Extraordinary!

No doubt my experience was better than I would have had on a smaller screen, but screen size is not really the issue here. Ghosting? What ghosting? Strobbing/flickering? Nope. Motion blur...yes but MUCH less than Imax 3D or MasterImage Digital 3D. The scene were Sully points his wooden spear towards the audience not only had real 3D pop, but it was sharp and in focus. Not only that, something else completely unapparent in my first 2 3D viewings. A few seconds after sully points the spear at audience he turns around and starts running...and his back to audience with his tail waving through the air had great 3D pop and depth. In the Imax and MasterImage 3D this was completely unapparent due to the heavy motion blur. Another seen with more 3D pop and depth was the close up on one of those vicious cat like creatures.

In fact, every single frame that had 3D pop on Imax/MasterImage, had crisper, cleaner, sharper MORE APPARENT 3D pop on the RealD 3D. The effect of 3D depth was likewise better. The whole experience was just so much more refined. The RealD 3D viewing was the only one were I heard members of the audience go "oooooo" "ah thats amazing" "thats so nice" etc..During the Imax and MasterImage viewings audience was silent. The level of detail was also on par with the Imax. I did not have the same "wow there is so much more detail" reaction like I did coming from MasterImage to IMAX. This is probably due to a much brighter image due to the Barco DP-3000. I paid $14 for the RealD 3D XD, I would gladly have paid $24 had I know how much better the experience was going to be. I doubt I will ever go to Imax 3D again. Not until they remove the problems which film based, dual projections brings.

Keep in mind I did not think the Imax 3D was particularly blurry until I saw the RealD 3D presentation. I just felt like something was missing after the first two 3D viewings. I would watch and think to myself the filmmakers clearly intended the effect to be more pronounced but it just wasn't happening on the MasterImage or Imax screens. Then after I saw it on RealD 3D I found what was missing. The sound system was a tad better than the IMAX imo. Highs were more crisp, sepration was better. The scene were one of the navi throws the rope around sully's ankles causing him to fall over, I heard the rope wooshing from behind my right shoulder past me and towards the screen. it actuality made my jump a bit.

Needless to say, I cannot see myself ever going back to Imax 3D as the RealD 3D experience is simply better on all levels especially on a large screen like Cinemarks XD.






今天得知波斯王子在CineX廳只放映到本週四,
週五起改放映慾望城市2.......這個決定令我滿傻眼的,
以這兩部片的片型,慾望2上CineX廳有點浪費,
更何況以暑假檔台灣觀眾群的愛好來說,
應該把波斯王子這種娛樂大片放在影音效果最好的大廳,
慾望城市的目標觀眾也不會去計較是在那種廳放映吧?
我原本打算這週六去CineX廳觀賞波斯王子,
如果真的改放映慾望2,那250元我可以省下來了......
建議其他有意去CineX看波斯王子的網友們打電話去反映!

夢時代喜滿客電話:(07)970-2000
上面在爭議甚麼專業實在很無聊,
電影是給大眾看的,看電影也不需要專業,
不是只有影視發燒友才有資格發表感想,
加上觀感每個人都不同,就像一部電影不管有多好看總會有人不喜歡,
(像我就不喜歡阿凡達這種老梗的電影)
排隊買票那麼多人有幾個會注意螢幕上的小缺點,
還是喇叭的重低音夠不夠力、有沒有空間感~= =
更有一堆人不知道數位影片和一般膠卷影片有啥不同,
老質疑別人的專業已經就失去討論的意義了。





(會不會也有人跑來查我帳號看是不是消毒人員)
超級小任任 wrote:
上面在爭議甚麼專業實...(恕刪)




說實在我也是看上面幾位大大,說網友評價 CINE X 不錯才第一時間衝去看的.....


其實一開始我也很懶得回上頭那位 "貼外國文" 的
"貼外國文的" 自己一再強調 "一直強迫人家接受" 誰強迫誰? (還不是一直貼外國文要人家認同)
你不是說了一堆人認同CINE X比IMAX優,有缺我一個嗎?
我也說了 "我" 看了這兩家的結論就是這樣....


這句可能大家誤解了 "真的要評比的話就要找專業" 我是在指那位 貼外國文的
(不是針對 amigo_530 大大 和 大家)先跟大家說抱歉!!
大家要發表偽IMAX缺點我很樂意聽........

偽IMAX缺點 (別串文我也說了)
喇叭四顆,椅子不好坐,坐位高低差不好,空間場地比喜滿客差,華納冷氣霉味,華納地毯味道..........


請 超級小任任 大大到另一串文看......喜滿客哪邊好壞該說我也說了

我也不想多說啥......說實在我也不知道他在爭啥?
CINE X贏他有錢賺?? IMAX贏我有錢賺??
貼一堆國外文 Cinemark XD 打偽IMAX ??
不然也該說個偽IMAX 缺點給大家聽,我也很想聽不知道的缺點
到這篇重點(低音)都沒回答他自己的看法......這
大家不是都說個人都有主觀,會因為我的看法改變他嗎?會改變大家看法嗎?還是我可以改變誰的看法?
兩家我看完"我的"感覺就是這樣,要我爭眼說瞎話還是吹捧CINE X最優?
他自己也說很多人認為CINE X比IMAX優,貼文是要我或人家認同他?
我也應要求說出了我看完CINE X的感覺,怎麼變成我 " 一直強迫人家接受"

既然是討論,我也希望他提出IMAX低音比CINE X弱阿,我也想知道弱在哪邊? (繼續看貼外國文還是..)


阿凡達劇情的確是老梗......我也去喜滿客SONY 4K看了
多了革命的3D變好看了



超級小任任 大大 以前我看過你的發言
如果是你來質疑我,我倒很樂意誠墾接受你的指教

(如果我要亂發文,我可以用新帳號,為什麼我不用新帳號?)
(GOOGLE YAHOO 01這邊隨便搜尋一下michang就可以找到我)

PS.如果這篇文有傷到不相干的人,私下密我或回文我都會道歉!!



當然大家也可以懷疑我票根作假!!
之前說坐G排原來是H排,H排我覺得太近,I排才是皇帝位
TO 樓上 michang 大 我沒誤解你啦~~

原本上週有抽到免費的CINEX票 但因為早上9點的票作霸沒去看

今天自己還是掏腰包 跟台北來的朋友去看了波斯王子

音響 真的沒話說 聽起來很爽 但某些片段會刺耳

銀幕 我個人覺得很大 但朋友從台北來 見識過IMAX也都在星橋看 所以都說還好

座位只開放到第10排 我偏好第8排觀影應是最佳位子 坐在第10排 會有種從高往下看電影的FU

週5後就恢復原價了 尚不知票價多少 不過也覺得250以上真的算貴

不管是IMAX或CINEX 跟北部的影廳比起來 銀幕都不算大 業者敢收這些票價真的很敢

尤其CINE X 竟然拿外面的優待票團券視會190元 一樣要加60塊 才能觀影
這種收價方式 未來恢復原價 就算購買優待票 勢必也比遠百IMAX貴 同樣片 我會轉向去看IMAX~

amigo_530 wrote:
不管是IMAX或CINEX 跟北部的影廳比起來 銀幕都不算大 業者敢收這些票價真的很敢

尤其CINE X 竟然拿外面的優待票團券視會190元 一樣要加60塊 才能觀影
這種收價方式 未來恢復原價 就算購買優待票 勢必也比遠百IMAX貴 同樣片 我會轉向去看IMAX~

最近高雄開了三家新的戲院
X賓天幕、X秀imin、及最新的**NE X

高雄何時有真正"名符其實"的大銀幕呀
amigo_530 wrote:
TO 樓上 mich...(恕刪)



我是看28 29兩天的優待票.....99元票根是寫190元
高雄的電影院有在進步,就像你說的兩家業者很敢收錢
250元要播慾望城市


CINE X和IMAX螢幕大小我看起來應該差不多大小.....
的確兩家比起台北還是很小
其實我也較傾向去喜滿客看,因為停車方便開到樓上就好

目前三家新的廳院,應該以國賓天幕廳銀幕最大吧?
可惜它的音響調整尚未達到應有的水準,
因為以全套QSC音響系統加上比台南國賓A廳更多顆的重低音(國賓人員告知的),
它的音效不應該是只有目前的表現!
如果它能很快的調整到位的話,它的票價(會員190、3D會員價250)
才能對另兩家造成一定程度的影響!
這邊有點不了解的是--要大螢幕坐前面一點不就好了嗎?尺寸大小應該是相對於距離吧!100吋如果坐100公尺遠,不是比你坐在電腦前看14吋的小嗎?
hahahrhr wrote:
這邊有點不了解的是-...(恕刪)

嗯~~搬張椅子坐在120吋家庭劇院前,應該也會覺得銀幕很大
那下次去遠百看imax 坐前面一點,也應會有像去美麗華看IMAX 的感覺哦
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!