Mac真的太好用了

haytt wrote:
Software availability
x86-based 64-bit systems sometimes lack equivalents to software that is written for 32-bit architectures. The most severe problem in Microsoft Windows is incompatible device drivers. Most application software can run in a 32-bit compatibility mode, also known as an emulation mode, e.g. Microsoft WoW64 Technology for IA64 and AMD64. The 64-bit Windows Native Mode[15] driver environment runs atop 64-bit NTDLL.DLL which cannot call 32-bit Win32 subsystem code (often devices whose actual hardware function is emulated in user mode software, like Winprinters). Because 64-bit drivers for most devices were not available until early 2007, using 64-bit Microsoft Windows operating system was considered impractical. However, the trend is changing towards 64-bit computing as most manufacturers provide both 32-bit and 64-bit drivers nowadays, so this issue is most likely to occur when attempting to use older peripherals. It should be noted that this is less of a problem with open source drivers that are already available for a 32-bit OS, since they can be modified to be 64-bit compatible, if necessary.
On most Macs, Mac OS X runs with a 32-bit kernel even on 64-bit-capable processors, but the 32-bit kernel can run 64-bit user-mode code; this allows those Macs to support 64-bit processes while still supporting 32-bit device drivers.

pkparty wrote:
就像但很多fello...(恕刪)...
Mac也許很好用，但如果在PC上玩不出什麼名堂，在Mac上頂多是更快發現還是玩不出什麼名堂

richie lee wrote:
你跟哪個妹約會關ＭＡＣ好不好用什麼事？？
搞不懂你是什麼心態,炫耀嗎？？

haytt wrote:
是吗？Many 64...(恕刪)

疯哥 wrote:
说了那么多，请解释你...(恕刪)

TheGeek wrote:
Mac 本來就不貴 = =

不知道大家有沒有去買過 IPS 面板的電腦螢幕....

有買過的都應該清楚價錢差很多.... 何況 MBP 跟 iMac 是 IPS + LED 背光

...(恕刪)