個人積分:13分
文章編號:33270541
"On September 15, 2011, non-parties Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“AMD”)
and its subsidiariesATI Technologies ULC and ATI International SRL filed a motion
to intervene and terminate theinvestigation based on a claim that AMD owns the
patents at issue and declines to assert them in this investigation. On September 19,
2011, respondent Apple filed its own motion to terminate based on AMD’s
patent ownership claims. Subsequently, the Commission determined to extend
the target date for completion of the investigation until November 21, 2011"
這才是原因吧... 看一下原判決書就知道前面提的對不對...
個人積分:1分
文章編號:33271521
為提供您更優質的服務,本網站使用cookies。若您繼續瀏覽網頁,即表示您同意我們的cookies政策。 了解隱私權條款




























































































