個人積分：556分
文章編號：35709024
個人積分：0分
文章編號：35709597
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_unpacked_2012-review-756p4.php
還有Anandtech, 聽過吧? 呵阿
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5811/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-preview
跑分明明S3贏 呵呵
不要再謠言了CNET UK 剛出爐的評比, 怪了, design, 螢幕 跟 總體 還是S3贏耶. 喔, 因為工讀生不會英文沒法到外國告洋狀?
http://crave.cnet.co.uk/mobiles/samsung-galaxy-s3-vs-apple-iphone-4s-vs-htc-one-x-50007834
100LED wrote:
真的很難相信S3跑分...(恕刪)
個人積分：93分
文章編號：35709729
個人積分：0分
文章編號：35709997
個人積分：23分
文章編號：35710032
個人積分：23分
文章編號：35710098
個人積分：122分
文章編號：35710113
還有Anandtech
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5811/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-preview
That said, I think HTC has clearly won the industrial design and in-hand feel category this time around. The obvious comparison point is the HTC One X (Tegra 3). When I compare the two side by side, the differentiation really comes down to display, and camera. The One X LCD is beautiful, and the One X/S camera is a very good performer. Subjective UI snappiness between the two are actually very close even though the SGS3's Exynos 4 Quad clearly holds an advantage over Tegra 3, but it ends up being accessories rather than core which will define the better device.
上面幾行英文是Anandtech在總結裡說的
我英文不好不知道誰可以翻譯一下
個人積分：23分
文章編號：35710511
wowowo88 wrote:
還有Anandtech
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5811/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-preview
That said, I think HTC has clearly won the industrial design and in-hand feel category this time around. The obvious comparison point is the HTC One X (Tegra 3). When I compare the two side by side, the differentiation really comes down to display, and camera. The One X LCD is beautiful, and the One X/S camera is a very good performer. Subjective UI snappiness between the two are actually very close even though the SGS3's Exynos 4 Quad clearly holds an advantage over Tegra 3, but it ends up being accessories rather than core which will define the better device.
上面幾行英文是Anandtech在總結裡說的
我英文不好不知道誰可以翻譯一下
我來雞婆一下，這段話簡單說的是" hTC One系列比S3好，要是我有錢，當然是買hTC One
漂泊異鄉的追夢人
個人積分：556分
文章編號：35711670
個人積分：1033分
文章編號：35711923
