taiwanstig wrote:
偶是要買來呸的,空...(恕刪)
最近看了英國的 Waht car 有RS3 測是報告:
http://www.whatcar.com/…/2015-audi-rs3-sportback-uk…/1350616
比較讓我重視的是以下幾段評語:
The new RS3 is much improved, handling-wise, starting with the steering. Audi has fitted a variable ratio steering rack, which makes the car quick to respond through sweeping bends, but avoids it being too darty around the straight-ahead.
Through corners the RS3's body stays level and the large tyres provide enormous grip. It feels more enjoyable to drive than the A45, although keen drivers will still have more fun in the more adjustable M135i.
The big surprise is how well the Audi rides - at least on the optional adaptive dampers we tried. Sure it’s still firm, but it’s more compliant than the A45 and only gets harsh over sharp ruts.
Standard equipment is also fulsome and includes Audi’s MMI infotainment with sat-nav and a reversing camera.
It’s more involving than the A45, and while it might not deliver quite as much fun as an M135i, point-to-point, there’s little doubt the Audi is the quicker car.
大概是說: 新RS3 跟舊 RS3 比,操控更好,進步很多.彎道因大胎抓地力優,所以彎道穩定.
操控樂趣是 M135i>RS3>A45
但無疑的 RS3 是最快的車.
原廠標備 MMI 導航與倒車顯影..
跟我原本的預期差異不大,僅剩賽倒成績,數據來證明以上的評語.
目前看來, RS3 298 萬, A45 268~271 萬.
RS3 貴約 30 萬,但多出的是
1. 後座出風口 : A45 選配要 3.6 萬
2. 倒車顯影 : A45 選配要 2.1 萬
3. 鋁圈 19 吋 :A45 選配要 4~5.9 萬
以上約 10 萬,價差剩 20萬...這20萬換得:
1. 2.5 引擎低轉速扭力較好
2. 7速手自排的可承受的最高扭力較高,應該也比較耐用,比較沒問題
3. 較快的換檔速度
4. 較有質感的內裝...我個人是這麼覺得啦! 或許有的人喜歡 A45
5. 較佳的四輪驅動設定.
6. RS3 前輪是八活塞卡前配浮動碟, A45 為四活塞非浮動碟.
若換算成數據 就是 0~100 4.3 vs 4.6 sec, 而看國外 0~200左右的加速比較, RS3 220 km/hr 時, A45 約為 210 km/hr.
而事後的保養問題,台灣 RS3 數量肯定比 A45 少,但除了正時皮帶的更換比較有技術的疑慮,RS3 使用正時鏈條,一般使用者應該用不到該換的壽命,其餘保養都不難,DIY 幾乎都沒問題.
這樣看來 RS3 是明顯贏過 A45, 選擇上完全不會猶豫..
但後來意外發現, RS3 sportback 行李箱竟然只有 280L比 A45 少 60L...少相當多.一般的 A3 有380L, 但RS3優點還是比 A45 多很多.
晚一點會上市的房車款 RS3 sedan 則可以補個 40 L 回來,但看來看去,我還是喜歡掀背車...
或許真的要犧牲行李箱空間了...



























































































