terrywan100 wrote:
查不到啊，你有查到就...(恕刪)
文章中有些連結已經失效，不過你打相關的關鍵字仍可下載政府官方資料
電動機車用電統計
難道不是嗎？你們誰提過任何數據？完全沒任何數據就批評豈不是無知？如果你認為這文章沒什麼問題，麻煩你改變觀念，廣為宣傳。
個人積分：16693分
文章編號：66356937
個人積分：103分
文章編號：66357810
個人積分：274分
文章編號：66360805
個人積分：345分
文章編號：66363021
個人積分：345分
文章編號：66369131
ch000253 wrote:最先我想問的是這個，資訊是從哪來的？
工研院研究過全台機車都是電動車一起充電也不超過發電量0.7%
結果就有人跑來插花，貼了篇討論區的討論。
再問又貼了篇GGR官方討論區的討論。
原來GGR官方討論區的討論=政府官方的研究數據
tjptw wrote:如果要比轉貼，我也來貼幾篇大家看看，客不客觀我不知道，但至少不是來自單一的GGR官方網站
我做什麼?我將別人計...(恕刪)
工研院-電動車比汽油車環保嗎？
把汙染轉到別地方！電動車真的環保嗎？
論電動車和汽油車的排放對比
站著說話之——人見光夫炮轟的不是電動車，而是豬頭
「阻止空汙就是別開柴油車」？──「綠能環保」沒那麼簡單：從德國的「反柴油車風暴」，警惕台灣「能源危機處理」
個人積分：16693分
文章編號：66369305
個人積分：731分
文章編號：66369838
個人積分：50分
文章編號：66371226
個人積分：345分
文章編號：66377485
tjptw wrote:我沒說楊教授的文章有問題，有問題是你講的，新加坡政府也是維持原罰款判決，搞烏龍是你自己說的吧？我只看到Musk急著去找新加坡總理李顯龍而已，不曉得要幹嗎？貼一下新加坡LTA針對這次事件的聲明，是英文的，新加坡官方正式的回應，你好好看看，新加坡政府有無說他們是錯誤的？如果你看得懂，麻煩你改變說法，廣為宣傳，不要再以訛傳訛。
楊教授的文章有問題你放上來是要幹嘛？
新加坡LTA的聲明如下：
The Land Transport Authority (LTA) has been in discussion with Tesla on the recent case of an imported used Tesla Model S, which attracted a $15,000 surcharge under the Carbon Emissions Vehicle Scheme (CEVS).
All imported used cars, including used electric cars, have to be subject to emissions and fuel efficiency tests before they are allowed to be registered for use in Singapore. This is because the emissions and fuel efficiency of a used car, unlike a new car, can vary significantly depending on its prevailing condition, how it was previously driven and maintained, etc. The imported Model S was first registered in Hong Kong in 2014.
Based on tests run by VICOM Emission Test Laboratory (VeTL), Mr Nguyen’s used Model S had an electrical energy consumption of 444 Wh/km. An emissions factor of 0.5g CO2/Wh was then applied. This emissions factor, which is based on data provided by EMA, is consistently applied to electric and plug-in electric hybrid cars to account for the carbon emissions produced when the car is being charged. The outcome showed a carbon emissions level which placed this used car into the CEVS C3 surcharge band.
Electric cars are not carbon emissions free. They may not produce emissions from the tailpipe like conventional cars, but they take electrical power from the national power grid which has to burn fuel to produce the electricity, and in the process produces carbon emissions.
Tesla has informed LTA that based on the car’s original Certificate of Conformity, its energy consumption rating was 181 Wh/km when it left the Tesla factory on 28 June 2014. LTA confirms that a brand new Tesla Model S would thus have fallen into the CEVS A1 band, and enjoyed a rebate. However, Mr Nguyen did not bring in a new Tesla Model S, but a used car, and as is the policy for the import of all used cars, must be individually subject to emissions and fuel efficiency tests since LTA would not know how much the car’s condition might have deteriorated. We cannot make exceptions as it would not be fair to other car owners, and would have an impact on our environment-related policies.
LTA and VeTL will be working with Tesla engineers to look further into this case.
LTA welcomes electric vehicle manufacturers to bring clean and energy-efficient vehicles into Singapore. An EV model which was previously imported brand new into Singapore is the Peugeot Ion which enjoyed rebates in the CEVS A1 band.
個人積分：731分
文章編號：66377698
