lordkon wrote:
IDF那半殘的短腿,第一個不合格吧(恕刪)
把教練型用不到的裝備拆掉 例如:機砲/後燃器
這樣多餘的空間可以轉給內置油箱使用,滯空時間可以加長
但教練機型還要強化抗粗暴操作
尤其是起落架的部分,所以整個結構是要重新設計
這跟設計一台全新的飛機沒什兩樣了
個人積分：0分
文章編號：62253299
個人積分：28109分
文章編號：62253619
個人積分：2193分
文章編號：62257250
個人積分：603分
文章編號：62258060
個人積分：1251分
文章編號：85437733
個人積分：3250分
文章編號：85448262
https://www.aviacionline.com/2022/07/why-did-the-fa-50-win-in-poland-f-15ex-and-kf-21-on-the-horizon/
Why did the FA-50 win in Poland? F-15EX and KF-21 on the horizon
......
Training costs and availability
The FA-50 also prevailed over the M-346 Master advanced trainer and light attack aircraft, which is currently in use in the Polish Air Force. As the minister explains in the interview:
«A pilot who has been trained on the FA-50 only needs a few hours to start flying the F-16 on his own. The cost of the training as such is much lower, and we could train more pilots that way. The M-346s in use now have too low availability; I have reported this several times to my Italian counterpart. That is why we decided to acquire the FA-50s. Let’s remember that the FA-50s themselves, according to data from current users, offer a high availability of about 85%.»
......
義大利原廠還會擺爛？！
個人積分：46026分
文章編號：85454466
個人積分：2758分
文章編號：85454892
