Bemo_Du wrote:
請問我們要找的答案...(恕刪)
不在喔,
Bemo_Du wrote:
請問我們要找的答案...(恕刪)

亞利安星人 wrote:
他從頭到尾就是在迴圈 21條H-2 未依照空服員指示
RULE 21 REFUSAL OF TRANSPORT
UA shall have the right to refuse to transport or shall have the right to remove from the aircraft at any point, any Passenger for the following reasons:
H. Safety – Whenever refusal or removal of a Passenger may be necessary for the safety of such Passenger or other Passengers or members of the crew including, but not limited to:
2. Passengers who fail to comply with or interfere with the duties of the members of the flight crew, federal regulations, or security directives;
不管空服員指示合不合理~有沒有必要性~有沒有侵犯乘客權利~是否和相關法令牴觸,
國外法學教授等的意見通通不算~
乘客要就吞下去~不然要告也告不贏啦大笑
還好多數美國人想法和他不一樣~^++^

Aznsilvrboy wrote:
強盜行為當然不用遵守. 任何違法的公司條款也當然無效. 但UA做的並沒有違法. UA也沒有不要做乘客的生意. 如果他有乖乖配合的話, UA會安排下一個班機給他搭乘. 我本身也不認同UA的做法因為有比這好太多的方法. 我只是想指出UA是有權力這麼處理的.
Aznsilvrboy wrote:
依契約, 合理與必要性是Delta自己說了算, 不是任何其他人可以干涉的. 當然乘客不服可以選擇訴訟, 但也不見得會贏因為契約通常已經將航空公司的權力最大化與責任最小化.