raguna wrote:
fully comp...(恕刪)
OKOK感謝解答~
那個45-200我來了~~~
關閉廣告
個人積分：334分
文章編號：31279244
個人積分：334分
文章編號：31279816
ejeanstone wrote:
OKOK感謝解答~那...(恕刪)
再回一下自己~
又找到這個測試網站~作者用E-P1和E-P3
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=zh-TW&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.clubsnap.com%2Fforums%2Freviews%2F962870-review-lumix-g-x-vario-pz-45-175mm-f4-0-5-6-asph-power-ois-power-zoom.html
當中作者提到幾點~
1.45-175這顆鏡頭沒有可以開關OIS的選項~就表示是默認，默認情況下就跟之前MEGA OIS和O家機身一樣~
擇一使用即可~
2.作者有幾段話跟照片來佐證OIS是有派上用場的~
在f5.6, 1/80, 175mm, ISO640 的情況下~
* Notice that for 175mm focal length (effective range at 350mm), it is advised to shot at least 1/350 to avoid handshake. This picture is shot at 1/80. Though not at 100% super sharp, I am quite convinced that the Power OIS works pretty convincing.
There are times I don’t feel like carrying around all the full compliment of lenses (anyway i dun have many), I took only 1 body, 20mm f1.7 and 45-175mm for a short vacation at Bali. 20mm f1.7 comes good in low light shot and shorter distance, where 45-175mm comes in handy to cover a very good tele range. I will be fully rely on the Power OIS, and left tripod at home.
結論:
Power OIS. I have tested few shots at maximum zoom, few stops below the recommended shutter speed (shutter spend > the focal length, ie 50mm -> max 1/50 sec), and the pictures turn out quite convincing. Though Oly PEN has a IBIS, in my opinion, the Power OIS comes much stronger and effective.
--
當然樓上有大大提到數位修正和對焦行程這我沒話說~從以前這兩家就互不支援數位修正~
不過些許的色像差或紫邊對我來說是可接受的範圍~
加上EP3螢幕上會正常顯示這顆鏡頭的當前焦段~算是很不錯的~
至於照片的銳利度或是作者有無手震，我想這就讓各位看官們自行判斷OIS是否有作用了~
不過相對於這顆的體積~內變焦~或是如果OIS真能如此強大的作用的話~
個人覺得還是有入手的價值~
個人積分：152分
文章編號：31290315
個人積分：334分
文章編號：31290397
個人積分：33分
文章編號：31291009
ejeanstone wrote:
本來看了前一頁版友有提到不支援ois~所以我想說乾脆去買45-200好了Orz...(恕刪)
像14-45與45-200 這管鏡頭是有防手震開關的
但是一般我都是關掉機身防震,使用鏡頭本身的OIS,光學防震這種情況下是可啓用的。
只要記得不要兩個都開就對了,機身防震與光學防震兩個會相衝討不到便宜。
雖然45-175mm 沒有那個開關,但我想不代表就不能使用OIS,我印象中14-42mm 裝上去也是能作用的。
另外我覺的就算目前韌體不支援,你第一個考慮的應該是m4/3的40-150,除非你要錄影,不然對O家用戶來說這管,比那棵45-200優秀多了,Ｐ家用戶少了機身防震,所以沒啥好選的。
