平心而論～CHR真正最該被嫌的致命傷是沒力的1.2引擎吧

womge20006 wrote:
沒關係啦！1年半後...(恕刪)

狗子2008 wrote:
真是奇了，豐田CHR還成為鍵盤車手的檢驗工具，
說實話，
CHR的車重及動力數據，
不優就是不優，比它優的多的是。

這台車，誰開過？
大家都是看數據，
說CHR不好的就是鍵盤車手，
說CHR好的就是懂車的？
這車還真是神到不要不要的！

blhsing wrote:
快笑死了，既然你沒開過，你憑什麼說C-HR的動力「不優就是不優」？

歐規C-HR在歐洲已經賣三個月，不知道已經有多少車評車主開過了，還什麼「這台車，誰開過」？上網閱讀有這麼難？

AutoExpress: "Best of the bunch for driver fun is the front-wheel drive 1.2-litre turbo."
Honest John: "Despite just 115PS and 185Nm torque, it’s fun to drive and there’s enough for safe overtaking."
AutoTrader: "once there are a few revs on the dial, it pulls you along very easily, and with a surprising amount of purpose."
Evo: "The 1.2 is better, and in manual mode the CVT can be quite fun while proving painless enough in auto mode."
CompleteCar: "Before we get onto the Hybrid, it's worth just mentioning the 1.2-litre petrol - because it's a little jewel."

自己慢慢看，我懶得翻譯了。

三寧SUNNY wrote:
1.2T這科技不錯但...(恕刪)

blhsing wrote:
快笑死了，既然你沒...(恕刪)

狗子2008 wrote:
好吧！車重 1460KG...(恕刪)

meridian wrote:
很在意0-100秒數的人, 其實也不用真的去試0-100多少秒, ...(恕刪)