但是突然就沒貨
所以改買其它牌子Z97的版子
最近看到又出現了
但是標示了Rev. 2.0
看官網圖也看不出差異
個人積分：155分
文章編號：53915470
個人積分：46分
文章編號：53920980
個人積分：2分
文章編號：53923385
我是在國外媒體看到這篇測試也是針對技嘉的B85M-HD3
分別測試B85M-HD3的Rev1.0及Rev2.0版本，在Rev1.0測試影片轉檔時， MOSFET溫度維持在80度，而使用廉價及少料的Rev2.0主機板效能較慢，並且MOSFET溫度上升到105~112度。除了少料連效能溫度也都有影響這是在社會欺騙大眾嗎?
After some comparisons the boards and indeed, revision 2.0 of the board have downgraded, one phase less, cheaper components. After putting it to the test, it became apparent that the performance of that motherboard is slower as well. It is mentioned that the Rev 1.0 B85M-HD3 motherboard does throttle back the CPU and measured MOSFET temperatures around 80°C during video transcoding. Now, for revision 2.0 it takes merely 6 minutes before the board throttles the CPU back to 800MHz as MOSFET temperatures of 105 to 112°C have been reached due to the hardware differences.
另外技嘉發言人在蘋果澄清說價格不盡相同，過完年還是一樣被國外媒體打臉。經銷商就只用國際條碼收料，不管啥版本都是單一條碼，根本沒人再區分rev.1234、因此價格也都一樣，消費者要等收到主機板才知道拿到正常版還是高溫版。國外媒體已經質疑技嘉的誠信了，台灣品牌的國際形象繼頂新後再一次顏面掃地。
So from the looks of things overall Gigabyte has been tampering with later revisions quite a bit, often to save on costs. But in all honesty sometimes we also noticed improvements on several SKUs. We'd figure this all is relevant enough to make the issue more know and 'out there' as you guys need make an informed decision when purchasing a product, this also obviously applies to resellers and distributors. We like to state that revisions of motherboards are common and a natural thing these days, where Gigabyte is going wrong though is that all these products are sold under the very same EAN/UPC code, meaning distributors purchase product revision A while they receive product B or C. But if a product is significantly different (less phases) or is performing even slightly less due to changes on the ODM side, then that raises significant enough questions.
個人積分：12分
文章編號：53925020
個人積分：2分
文章編號：53929661
個人積分：701分
文章編號：53942672
個人積分：1165分
文章編號：53968138
個人積分：46分
文章編號：53971239
個人積分：1165分
文章編號：53975439
個人積分：701分
文章編號：54046795
