個人積分：101分
文章編號：18520071
個人積分：1分
文章編號：18527851
個人積分：6分
文章編號：18533925
個人積分：93分
文章編號：18533966
個人積分：6分
文章編號：18534146
個人積分：93分
文章編號：18534253
個人積分：6分
文章編號：18534255
個人積分：6分
文章編號：18534278
個人積分：93分
文章編號：18534298
The choice of architecture comes down to one of utility. If the application cannot tolerate an expensive, failure-prone, power-intensive mechanical shutter, an interline device is the right choice. Consumer snap-shot cameras have used interline devices. On the other hand, for those applications that require the best possible light collection and issues of money, power and time are less important, the full-frame device is the right choice. Astronomers tend to prefer full-frame devices. The frame-transfer falls in between and was a common choice before the fill-factor issue of interline devices was addressed. Today, frame-transfer is usually chosen when an interline architecture is not available, such as in a back-illuminated device.
這是從硬體面來解釋，而LEICA的之所以選擇FFT-CCD另一個原因，推測應該是不想讓影像經過二次加工（校正）。
天知地知．妳知我知
