millerliu wrote:
etrex 30直接接收GPS+GLONASS, 不知道在森林中定位中是否有差異? ...(恕刪)
etrex 30支援GPS+GLONASS應該是使用新晶片。我的sony ericsson xperia mini手機更新到android 4.03後就有支援GPS+GLONASS,當GPS衛星較少時,GLONASS衛星就會加進來,衛星比較多定位速度和精度應該會比較高。
DTang88 wrote:
不知道實際使用上的效果如何?
如果在山上,大部份情況不是衛星不夠多,是天空的遮蔽太多。
不知道有沒有人能給個實測呢?
60CSx/62st/Oregon/eTrex 30 之間的比較。最好是在山上,山凹處。
millerliu wrote:
eTrex 30的GPS+GLONASS實測大概只有美國網友Jaschiu最有經驗:
http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=228&t=2183180&r=4&p=2
millerliu wrote:
另外, 在山谷中使用GPS, 通常開機後經過這區域頂多誤差放大而已, 還不至於斷訊, 若要在此谷地開機使用GPS, 我想連eTrex 30也會有問題. BTW, 啟用GPS+GLONASS時耗電會較大, 可要善用. Garmin blog有提到: When using GLONASS satellites and GPS, the time it takes for the receiver to “lock on” to a position is (on average) approximately 20 percent faster than using GPS alone. Furthermore, when using both GPS and GLONASS, the receiver has the ability to lock on to 24 more satellites than using GPS alone. This is particularly helpful for users who need reliable satellite navigation in challenging environments such as deep canyons or urban environments where a large portion of the sky is blocked by solid objects. The disadvantage to using both systems simultaneously is a reduction in battery life.
DTang88 wrote:
這篇文章在發表時,已...(恕刪)

