ibrik wrote:
看來網友勝算的確不怎...(恕刪)
對照這篇跟以下消基會吳秘書長跟Dell交手的經過
中央社記者何宏儒台北 6日電）中華民國消費者文教基金會秘書長吳家誠今天表示，至少已三度與戴爾公司協商，「（對方）整個腦筋都在想賺錢，而不是維持聲譽」、「誠意非常不夠」，不排除以團體訴訟求償。
袋噁“整個腦筋都在想賺錢“ ,照常理說因為標價“錯誤“造成公司意外損失,要找出造成“錯誤“的原因到底是誰造成的,（例如是網管或是負責輸入的）這點實在有違常理,看看美國人怎麼看待噁這件“標錯價“的事件：
Vic De Zen @ Jul 6th 2009 9:31AM
I'm surprised we have yet to hear news about someone stepping down from the company for these price misprints.（該公司到目前為止還沒有人因為這次誤植價格而下台）
EI8HT @ Jul 6th 2009 10:22AM
with all due respect, i would have to disagree. i honestly think many times they do it on purpose to draw attention (i.e. free advertisements from slickdeals, fat wallet, etc.) then, once they have people interested in their products, they ask them to drop their shorts and pay full price. i don't think i've ever come across a price mistake, for example, on apple's website, probably due to the fact that they try to hire competent people.
(他們多次如此做是要吸引注意力,像是免費的廣告...等）
原文來自癮科技
http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/06/dell-taiwan-gets-sidelined-after-second-bargain-incident/
這件事情發展到此為止,實在有違常理,發生錯誤,沒找出造成錯誤的罪魁禍首(例如是哪個離職員工搞的鬼,連續兩次）卻是“整個腦筋都在想賺錢,而不是維持聲譽".
隨著袋噁提出的補償方案,網友也提出很多事證,例如該產品在台灣網站六萬多的價格比鄰近的香港跟中國.日本都貴了一萬多到接近兩萬
,怎麼這麼巧,扣掉袋噁提出的兩萬折扣正好差不多
消費者要買便宜又大碗產品的心裡是很普遍的也並無不對,但是若是廠商利用消費者的心理以欺騙的方式變相打知名度,是不應該被原諒的
