Dpreview for X-pro1

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x-pro1/26

finally comes out. 79, silver

compare to EM-5 80, Nex-7 81

but IQ is better, especially JPEG.

2012-06-29 5:14 #1

scsiraid

5分

2樓

scsiraid

個人積分：5分

文章編號：36839580

leopoldpeter wrote:
http://www...(恕刪)

Yes, according to the charts, the Jpeg is better than Canon 5D2, 5D3, D800, D800e. But their Raw images are better than X-pro 1. So, as we knew, the x-pro 1 is JPEG shooters' camera. For casual/daily/spontaneous shooting, this is a really excellent camera.

我是老阿伯來的

92分

3樓

我是老阿伯來的

個人積分：92分

文章編號：36843647

Slow autofocus compared to its mirrorless peers
Dysfunctional manual focus
Overly-conservative DOF scale useless for zone focusing
Poor auto ISO implementation (uses too-slow shutter speeds)
Live Histogram doesn't work in manual exposure mode (always implies correct exposure)
No face detection AF system
Unimpressive video mode
Limited control customisation
Continuous drive mode uses different filename convention
Very low playback magnification when shooting RAW only

上述的缺點都還算可以接受

focuslight63

169分

4樓

focuslight63

個人積分：169分

文章編號：36845233

Good for :
Photographers looking for a combination of excellent image quality, traditional dial-based handling and discreet operation in an interchangable-lens camera.

Not so good for :
Shooting moving subjects, video work

難產很久的評測終於出來了啊
反正要買之前早就知道拍運動題材不行,錄影不實用了
所以倒是還好...

要拍小孩時我就拿 E-M5 出來頂一下...