minlon5814 wrote:
如提不知哪一隻比較優...(恕刪)
感覺像是買了法拉利然後問台製輪胎哪一牌比較優？
個人積分：539分
文章編號：37476393
個人積分：7118分
文章編號：37476919
個人積分：5分
文章編號：37478400
抗議一下樓上的大大.....
.....
又輕巧......
個人積分：219分
文章編號：37478457
http://kenrockwell.com/tokina/17-35mm.htm
This Tokina 17-35mm f/4 is as sharp as Nikon's professional 17-35mm f/2.8 AF-S.
It's not quite as sharp and lacks the VR of Nikon's 16-35mm VR.
This Tokina lens has much less distortion than any other ultrawide zoom, regardless of price. Unlike any other ultrawide zoom, this Tokina's distortion is invisible at almost every setting. Nikon and Canon's best pro ultrawide zooms have double this distortion!
Considering that this Tokina 17-35mm is smaller and lighter than either of the Nikon lenses, and costs half as much, it's easy to recommend it for all full-frame film and digital cameras.
The Tokina 17-35mm f/4 is as sharp as Nikon's professional 17-35mm f/2.8 AF-S that costs more than twice as much.
It's not as sharp as Nikon's 16-35mm VR, but no other SLR zoom lens is, either.
This Tokina is blurrier in the corners of FX at 17mm at f/4, just like Nikon's 17-35mm. Both these lenses get sharper in the corners as stopped down, and are sharp at 17mm throughout most of the image, even at f/4.
At 24mm, this Tokina lens is sharp corner-to-corner on FX even at f/4, which is better than the Nikon 17-35mm.
At 35mm, this Tokina is slightly softer at f/4 throughout the frame, and super-sharp from f/5.6 on.
個人積分：183分
文章編號：37479404
個人積分：7118分
文章編號：37479949
個人積分：3分
文章編號：37482829
個人積分：46分
文章編號：37483849
個人積分：135分
文章編號：37486688
個人積分：74分
文章編號：37486814
就是因為我有一隻1635 f4g我嫌她的夜拍真的不太理想..星芒真的不夠漂亮
