個人積分：310分
文章編號：23584207
個人積分：170分
文章編號：23584247
個人積分：79分
文章編號：23584287
個人積分：62分
文章編號：23584311
個人積分：6分
文章編號：23584343
個人積分：48分
文章編號：23584363
個人積分：13分
文章編號：23584394
個人積分：27分
文章編號：23584515
ZIPY wrote:
真的好貴呀，比D30...(恕刪)
DPReview: D7000 after a week-long trip to Paris
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1034&message=36798676&changemode=1
2) Things like BIF, I shot some birds flying in Paris parks. Especially with white birds like seagulls, that would fly in front of colorful backgrounds (which Paris parks now present), I got much less keepers in focus that I would typically get with D700. With slow things in motion, like people running, no problems.
3) White balance in incandescent light, my D700 is just much more accurate, when shooting side-by-side, D700 nails the white balance while D7000 is not as accurate. Which is surprising to me because D7000 is two years newer and supposedly has a newer metering system.
There were several instances of wrong white balance. One was when I was trying to photograph La Madeleine from outside and it just was not looking right...
How you fix it? If you bring your white card, try to use it. Otherwise, shoot RAW and hope you can fix wb later. Must shoot RAW of course
綜合最近看到的國內外討論文章，D7000只是高ISO 性能比較吸引人，
對焦性能、白平衡... 並沒有多大長進，拍攝飛鳥的成功率不高，複雜光源下的白平衡不準～
就機身性能來說，D7000 跟D300s 相比還是差很多～
因此，預算沒問題的話，還是直上D300s；不然買D90 還比較划算。
個人積分：31分
文章編號：23584693
個人積分：10分
文章編號：23584781
