攝影家手扎 wrote:
樓主要不是電池有問題就是機子有問題 不要怪到D800去...

機子不就是D800嗎?? 我是覺得問題比較大的是電池本身!!
DSLR的結構本來就存在各式各樣的移焦問題,若只是鏡頭移焦還可以通過機身修正
但是機身本身問題,那問題點就還是在"DSLR"這個型式身上...
現在可換鏡頭式相機並不是只有DSLR一種...

高畫素原本就需要更精確、嚴謹的操作相機才能達到更精美的結果
現代數位相機也不是只有D800才有這種情況...連X-Pro1 1600萬畫素都常常見到因輕微晃動而拍不出該有的銳利度。
要拍出銳利不晃動的照片恐怕並不是換顆有防手震的鏡頭就能張張完美

除了改變拍照心態,不要過度在意移焦、晃動等問題;或是多縮光圈求景深、多上腳架等方式。
若無法改變心態那倒不如換上畫素較一般的相機,才不會投資了高成本又得不到等比實質的提升,卻又帶給自已許多的困擾。

wechisu wrote:
2012-09-30 19:47 by wechisu

5.
電池EN-EL15沒擋頭很耗電,通常沒在開live view,斷斷續續使用下來通常不會超過150張

最後決定賣了它,因為實在駕馭不了它,


1-4點沒有相關經驗,不予置評

第5點呢,本人都是開著live view拍,一顆電池充飽都可以拍超過250張
沒開live view只能拍不到150張,除非每張照片都花很多時間來回構圖或是對焦
否則真的不太可能

a277888 wrote:
以下是我使用三個月的...(恕刪)


呵呵 可能是機身白平衡偏移 調過頭了... 大概是自己喜歡這個色調,

不過有貼也比光用嘴砲好多了.....

Kami@JiaWei wrote:
痾....先說聲抱歉...(恕刪)


你這樣調後, 顏色應該是準的
但是感覺好不好, 就因人而異了.
謝啦!
自從d800上市後就一直注意任何相關消息.
綜合使用者的反應.並沒有影響到近期要入手的決定
記得D800剛問世時.本版置頂的使用測試報告.其中所拍出的樣品.不知大家有沒印象?
許多都是手震的痕跡.所以乍看之下感覺畫質普普
手上不管用任何機子.我覺還是要有人機一體的概念.好好去了解它
如有硬體的問題.還是建議找專業維修人員諮詢
記得當時剛入手D90時.對它真的超不滿意的
本來想要上網脫手賣了.不過熟悉一陣子之後才深感他真的是一台好機子
不過樓主如果對D800覺得不甚理想.還是建議賣了它.相信現在中古行情還不錯
手上握有現金.日後再入手別的機子.回到熱愛的攝影....
重複回覆.自刪...
1212121212121212
再貼一次大家看一下

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkP1bGRQMdM&feature=player_embedded#!


這個問題確實是有的, 不是空穴來風, 國外討論區也不少人在反應移焦的問題


Summary:
Nikon has acknowledged, found and understood the root cause of the issue. It has been eliminated in the current production (however, I guess we'll never know when and from which serial numbers on).
The root cause is a misalignment of the AF module when mounted, outside of Nikon's own production tolerances. But be asserted we are still talking micro meters here ...
The issue for affected D800 can be solved in selected Nikon service centers; such as Düsseldorf, Germany.
The procedure is currently rolled out to more Nikon service centers.
The fixing procedure for Nikon is a tedious one. It includes writing individual calibration values into the firmware. For larger deviations, the AF module will first mechanically be re-aligned. This may actually include the AF auxiliary mirror in some cases.
This method is believed to deliver an autofocus precision which is at least as good as of cameras from a fresh batch. I could not clarify if there is a chance for both methods being non-equivalent in some way. However, Nikon Germany does not think so. They rather wholeheartedly believe that the in-service calibration procedure resolves the issue as good as current production does, if not better.
Nikon does actually not know how many D800 of the early batches have been affected. Despite all oddities, the so-called service-rate of the D800 is unremarkable and only "sligthly increased" (compared to other camera models).


Myalegon wrote:
再貼一次大家看一下h...(恕刪)


又不是沒有辦法處理,拿去送修就可以,好嗎

skkaio wrote:
又不是沒有辦法處理,拿去送修就可以,好嗎



你沒有看英文內文嗎? 應該沒這麼難懂吧.....

The issue for affected D800 can be solved in selected Nikon service centers; such as Düsseldorf, Germany.

文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 10)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!