The Nikon D4 is an update to 2007's Nikon D3.

The new Nikon D4 offers slightly higher frame rates, slightly higher resolution, an updated AF system that works better with teleconverters, Kelvin white balance settings in 10K increments, a virtual horizon that finally works properly with both roll and pitch, much higher ISOs than the D3 and D3s, and wow, video.

The Nikon D4 is aimed at full-time professional news, sports and action photographers – or videographers shooting Canon DSLRs.

For landscape, nature and portrait and wedding photographers, the Nikon D3x still has more resolution. For use in the field, the Nikon D7000 has the same resolution as the D4 with a lot less weight.

For most of us, the Nikon D4 is just a minor update to the D3, unless one of its features, like video or seeing in the dark at six-digit ISOs is a must-have for you. Otherwise, it's still the same camera as 1996's Nikon F5: there hasn't been any significant advance in basic ergonomics, shutter speeds, flash sync, metering or much of anything else for the past 16 years. (In fact, the Nikon F5's shutter goes all the way down to a timed 30 minutes all by itself, which I use and which no DSLR does.)

The D4 weighs about 3 ounces less than the D3, which is great news.

The D4 has only one CF card slot, and replaces the second with a slot for the new XQD cards. Great, now I have to buy new memory cards no one has ever seen just for backup!

Hallelujah, the buttons are now backlit, just like my 20-year old cell phone. The D4 also supposedly works with the good remote, the $15 ML-L3, and lets you have the camera vary its auto ISO shutter speed with focal length.

If you're a full-time pro, all these little things add up to make getting a couple of these a no-brainer. If you're not full time and the price of a new camera matters, then no, the D4 is nowhere near as innovatice as the Nikon F4 was when it was anounced. See Is It Worth It if you're undecided.


紅字部分,個人認為,

中肯

還有電池部份:
新的電池容量又沒比較高---->換什麼換呀,真是搞不懂!

在記憶卡方面

QXD cards are bogus — Lexar doesn't make them, and I don't know about SanDisk. Therefore, the QXD slot is largely useless. I'll only use Lexar and SanDisk cards. Got a QXD reader? I didn't think so.

說的真好!


所以。

我還是繼續等d5 吧!


爬山的阿光 wrote:
The Nikon ...(恕刪)

爬山的阿光 兄:
電池部份是因為日本新法規定,所以之前不是有D700一些機身日本停賣!

個人就感覺是NIKON單數是比較大創新世代,雙數屬於較穩定性能時期,所以如果要買創新+穩定買單數S版。

有D3S也不需要買D4,而NIKON 1一些內埋式相位對焦可能在大感光元件還需要一些時間,D4還是留給那些職業用戶!
diffusionless wrote:
人就感覺是NIKON單數是比較大創新世代,雙數屬於較穩定性能時期,所以如果要買創新+穩定買單數S版。


哈!

你的這番話

突然讓我想到底片機時期的

F3 ---> F4 ---> F4S ---> F5

F3還真的是一台好機!
F5更不用說了

相對的F4就比較......

平安、健康最重要
1.高ISO3200以上.

2.新一代的處理器與對焦系統之效能與成果.

上面這兩點除非有壓倒性的表現,不然對持有D3s的用家來說,真的誘因不大.

當然,針對準備要使用相機當HD攝影機用家來說,D4還是有它的吸引力.
Cloud Chao : http://album.blog.yam.com/apsat6

爬山的阿光 wrote:
哈!你的這番話突然讓...(恕刪)


F4s個人覺得也不錯啊

離題了
My Blog=== http://blog.xuite.net/commyy/twblog

uging wrote:
F4s個人覺得也不錯...(恕刪)


F4s好重喔!不過F4就很重了。
話說回來從F3到F4可是從沒有自動對焦變到有自動對焦耶!
F4那個造型還是名設計師-喬治亞羅設計的耶!
Nikon的所有底片機中,好像沒有其他哪一台是有自動對焦,又掛上快門轉盤的了吧!
Ken的回文有時候是比較偏激一點, 尤其是他不喜歡的(或者是得罪過他的).

D4推出主要還是呼應對手陣營的1DX, 宣示N家在提高畫素/錄影這一塊也成功的趕上對手,過去4年來, D3/D3s/ D700在高ISO畫質的領域豎立了一個太成功的里程碑,所以D4能夠強化的部分也有限,可是D3/ D3s/ D700相對於對手陣營的來說為用戶所詬病的畫素不足以及缺少錄影(D3s有,但也是比較陽春)等,在D4這一塊上補齊了.

這次雙方旗艦機算是旗鼓相當,而等二月中N家 D800發佈之後,就等著看C家下一波的回應了.
^^A 請多多指教~

Cloudchao wrote:
2.新一代的處理器與對焦系統之效能與成果.


D4搭載新一代expeed 3晶片的效能是D3s 處理效能的22 倍,
若搭配新規格的記憶卡125mb/sec的讀寫速度,
(若沒記錯的話sandisk目前應該是90mb/sec)
在對焦或錄影方面的效能應該有顯著的提升



MUS wrote:
而等二月中N家 D800發佈之後...(恕刪)


REALLY ??


ef bb bf e3 80 8c e4 b8 8d e6 95 99 e8 80 8c e6 ae ba e8 ac 82 e4 b9 8b e8 99 90 ef bc 9b e4 b8 8d e6 88 92 e8 a6 96 e6 88 90 e8 ac 82 e4 b9 8b e6 9a b4 ef bc 9b e6 85 a2 e4 bb a4 e8 87 b4 e6 9c 9f e8 ac 82 e4 b9 8b e8 b3 8a ef bc 9b e7 8c b6 e4 b9 8b e8 88 87 e4 ba ba e4 b9 9f ef bc 8c e5 87 ba e7 b4 8d e4 b9 8b e5 90 9d ef bc 8c e8 ac 82 e4 b9 8b e6 9c 89 e5 8f b8 e3 80 82 e3 80 8d
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!