gam wrote:
Samsung NV...(恕刪)
EP1
Detail (D-SLR) Rating (out of 10)
Build quality 9.0
Ergonomics & handling 7.5
Features 9.0
Image quality 9.0
Performance (speed) 7.0
Value 8.5
說的重點是D-SLR
個人積分：0分
文章編號：13687582
個人積分：231分
文章編號：13687718
個人積分：12分
文章編號：13688095
個人積分：63分
文章編號：13690172
挖洗不良中年 wrote:
DPreview給分也是看同級機在評分的,
所以小DC的畫質分數, 也有機會拿高分.
同是O家的E30, 畫質就只拿到8.0 ,
但這不一定是說EP1畫質就比E30優那麼多.
明明就不是跟小DC 在比阿....
Dpreview 寫跟同價位的slr 比.
不過我覺得Dpreview 在比畫質主要就是看三點
解析度, iso, dynamic range. 其他想這邊常看到的立體感阿, 通透感阿, 奶油什麼的都不是以這個來做標準.
E-1 再 Dpreview 來說應該是個超級廢柴吧.
Image Quality
Arguments will continue to rage about the E-P1's features and performance but few could find any serious fault with its image quality, which is easily as good as most SLRs at a similar price point. Yes, it's fractionally noisier than the best APS-C models (particularly if you turn the noise filter off to get the maximum detail), and yes, the dynamic range isn't as good as the very best-in-class cameras, but honestly we're splitting hairs here. Our overall impression of the E-P1's image quality was and remains overwhelmingly positive.
The 14-42mm zoom is as good as any SLR kit lens (we were less impressed by the 17mm pancake, which has the single standout feature that it's very thin), and in optimal conditions the E-P1 is capable of capturing superb levels of detail. Crucially, unlike many DSLRs, you don't need to shoot raw to get the best results; the JPEG engine produces remarkably good output at all ISO settings - though we'd avoid ISO 100 simply because you lose so much dynamic range, and ISO 3200/6400 are pushing the sensor a bit too far.
個人積分：139分
文章編號：13691298
個人積分：54分
文章編號：13691875
個人積分：231分
文章編號：13692892
個人積分：8分
文章編號：13693492
個人積分：61分
文章編號：13693609
個人積分：118分
文章編號：13693744
