文章關鍵字
這叫開賣那幾天

那些酸畫質和機身品質的人怎麼混下去阿

比XXXX和XXXXX要高耶





不過分數參考參考就好= =

適合自己、用的開心才是最重要的~~
kikali wrote:
這叫開賣那幾天
那些酸畫質和機身品質的人怎麼混下去阿
比XXXX和XXXXX要高耶

DPreview給分也是看同級機在評分的,
所以小DC的畫質分數, 也有機會拿高分.
同是O家的E30, 畫質就只拿到8.0 ,
但這不一定是說EP1畫質就比E30優那麼多.

看文字說明中, DPreview對EP1的畫質評語相當正面,
認為可以比得上價位差不多的DSLR,
對於心動EP1卻還沒行動的玩家, 算是一劑強心劑吧!

DPreview對EP1有一句評語很有意思:
"The head says no, the heart says go."

評測裏的一句話.....The head says no, the heart says go!

真是一語中的啊.....!
Nikon D5000
Build quality 8
E&H 8
Features 9
Image quality 8.5
Speed 8.5
Value 8

Canon EOS %D mark II
Build quality 8.5
E&H 9.5
Features 9.5
Image quality 9.5
Speed 8.5
Value 9.0

Canon EOS 500D
Build quality 8
E&H 8
Features 9
Image quality 8.5
Speed 8
Value 8

EP-1
Build quality 9
E&H 7.5
Features 9
Image quality 9
Speed 7
Value 8.5



在Highly Recommended下面還破天荒的附註這句話
"though probably not for everyone"
大概在某種程度上也反映了e-p1的"驚世駭俗",不太適合傳統守舊人士
j2j wrote:
Nikon D500...(恕刪)

Canon G10
Build quality 9.5
Ergonomics & handling 9.0
Features 9.5
Image quality 8.0
Optics 9.0
Performance (speed) 8.5
Value 7.0

Panasonic LX3
Build quality 9.0
Ergonomics & handling 8.0
Features 8.5
Image quality 8.5
Optics 9.0
Performance (speed) 8.5
Value 8.0

So? wuts ur point?
j2j wrote:
Nikon D500...(恕刪)






還是要補一下
Panasonic GH1
Build quality 8.5
Ergonomics & handling 8.5
Features 9.5
Image quality 8.5
Performance (speed) 9.0
Value 8.0


EP-1
Build quality 9
E&H 7.5
Features 9
Image quality 9
Speed 7
Value 8.5
j2j wrote:
Nikon D500...(恕刪)


Samsung NV10
Build quality 9.5
Ergonomics & handling 8.5
Features 7.0
Image quality 7.0
Optics 7.0
Performance (speed) 8.0
Value 9.0

Canon PowerShot A640
Build quality 9.0
Ergonomics & handling 8.0
Features 8.0
Image quality 8.0
Optics 8.0
Performance (speed) 8.0
Value 8.0

你想說的重點是什麼?
kikali wrote:
這叫開賣那幾天
那些酸畫質和機身品質的人怎麼混下去阿
比XXXX和XXXXX要高耶...(恕刪)

當時還有某人預測畫質只會拿7分勒

我倒是回了那個人:
以dpreview的測試方式來說, EP1畫質得分絕對不可能比E620低, 最少也是同分

果然印證我的說法了, 畫質分數硬是比E620高0.5
dpreview的評測員應該要大喊知我者meridian也....
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 8)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!