君子于役 wrote:
正好cameralabs...(恕刪)
O家的PL7 是沒對焦嗎 怎落差那麼大 感覺是為了凸顯GF7
個人積分：17分
文章編號：55167839
個人積分：195分
文章編號：55168721
a123395879 wrote:
O家的PL7 是沒對焦嗎 怎落差那麼大 感覺是為了凸顯GF7
文章有寫喔，他們對於EPL7的畫質也是很驚訝，整體表現很差，連絡Olympus後，又寄來一顆14-42mm，結果還是差不多。
所以他們認為要嘛他們不走運，碰到兩顆都畫質很差的不良品，要嘛就是O牌的14-42mm畫質真的很不好。
The results from the Olympus PEN E-PL7 are quite disappointing when viewed alongside those from the Lumix GF7. The Olympus 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 EZ lens has produced crops that are very soft and a little blurry, not just at the edges, but across the entire frame. I was so concerned about the quality of these results from the E-PL7 that I contacted Olympus and asked them to send a replacement. As it turned out, the images I shot with the new lens were no better, so it appears that either we were very unlucky, with two individual lenses producing poor results, or the quality of the M.Zuiko 14-42 f3.5-5.6 EZ kit lens leaves much to be desired. As you can see from the sample images in my E-PL7 review, the camera produces much better results with other lenses attached.
其實看另外的 Lumix GF7 vs PEN E-PL7 vs Samsung NX3000 JPEG Noise。也有同樣現象。O牌的14-42mm真的就是畫質比較軟。
如果是對焦問題，兩次不同地方的拍攝，加上ISO測試也拍了很多張，都要說是對焦不準的問題，機率應該不大了吧。
個人積分：0分
文章編號：55880675
