噗哈哈 wrote:
可能是照片有被破壞壓...(恕刪)
我想那個原始圖片的鍊結裏面的圖
應該比小圖好很多吧?!
WoodyChang wrote:
注意一下!我前面已經有講,"之前"
~~也就是跟D70跟D200那個時代比(現在的D700/D3已經不是這色調了)
只要在PS的bridge點開後
預設值拉一下"振動"(CS2還是CS3) 跟降一下色溫就可以達到我說的效果
相反的C拉起來是另外一回事
你要不要先試看看??.(恕刪)
吉姆林 wrote:
我剛又確認了一次,『...(恕刪)
* JPEG (Fine): 6 fps for 22 frames, then 2 frames at 3fps captured every second (approx) up to 100 frames in total. Approx 10 seconds to recover.
* JPEG (Normal): 6fps for 32 frames, then 4 frames at 4fps (approx) followed by 2-3 frames at 5fps (approx) up to 100 frames. Approx 10 seconds to recover.
* RAW: 6 fps for 10 frames, then 2 frames at 2fps captured every 2-3 seconds. 16 seconds to recover.
* RAW+ JPEG (Fine): 6 fps for 10 frames, then around 0.5 fps. Approx 22 seconds to recover.
nthomas wrote:
說真的我覺得Pentax很可憐
01測過這麼多台單眼
基本上每台拍出來的sample看起來都沒有太大的差異
但K-5拍的就會被說成像DC
MOUSE73 wrote:
K-5跟D7000做過交叉測試的國外評測網站不少,
其實2部都很不錯表現不過伯仲之間,
DXO的兵器譜排行K-5第6名小贏D7000的第10名,
幾個評測網站的結果給您參考一下,
應該會比您個人的感覺準確一點。
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/en/Camera-Sensor/Sensor-rankings
http://dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos60d/page18.asp
...(恕刪)