個人積分：14分
文章編號：45706180
個人積分：10593分
文章編號：45711180
個人積分：69分
文章編號：45718625
我大概列一些這些可以被你們告到死的車商,總賠償金額應該可以破兆.
煞車不牽扯到物理真的是不簡單耶...還是你剎車是用化學反應?
至於人要快過電腦系統,這輩子不可能了,FPGA算一個process可以到μs級.
1000μs=1ms 這些系統都是RTOS級在運作的.
我想我應該推薦車廠派你們這麼專業的人員去協助系統開發,他們怎麼可以忽略了每台車剎車性能都不同阿? 哀阿,難怪人家說台灣人才濟濟,實在不假阿...
| Make | Full speed range ACC | Partial cruise control | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Models | Notes | Models | Notes | |
| BMW | 2007 5-series, 2010+ X5 excl Diesel, 2013 3-series | Active Cruise Control with Stop & Go | 2000 7, 5, 6, 3 | (only as an option together with big engines, Stop & Go Variant available on 3, 5, 6 and 7 models) (Active Cruise Control) |
| Mercedes-Benz | 2006 S, B, E, CLS, CL (2009+); A, CLA, M, G, GL (2013+) | Distronic Plus | 1998 S, E, CLS, SL, CL, M, GL, CLK, 2012 C | Distronic |
| Volkswagen | Passat, Touareg (2011+) Golf (2013+) | not in US | Passat, Phaeton all generations, Touareg | |
| Audi | A8, A7, A6 (2011+); Q7 (2007+),A3 (2013+),Q5 (2013+) | Adaptive Cruise Control with Stop & Go | A3, A4 (see a demonstration on YouTube), A5, Q5, A6, A8 (also uses data from navigation and front camera sensors),[17] Q7 | |
| Bentley | Continental GT (2009+) | Follow-to-Stop option | ||
| Porsche | Panamera (2010+); Cayenne (2011+), Cayman (2013+), Boxster(2012+) | Porsche Active Safe (PAS), PDK transmission only. | ||
| Vauxhall / Opel | Insignia, Zafira Tourer (on selected variants of SE, SRi, Elite, VXR), Astra | |||
| Jaguar | 1999 XK-R, S-Type, XJ, XF | |||
| Land Rover | Range Rover (2013+) | Range Rover Sport | ||
| Volvo | V40, S60,[18] S80, XC60, XC70[19] | Also includes full power automatic braking under 20 mph | ||
| Cadillac | XTS, ATS, SRX (2013+) | Also includes full power automatic braking under 20 mph | 2004 XLR, 2005 STS, 2006 DTS (shuts off below 25 mph) | |
| Chevrolet | Impala (2014+) | Availability: Early Spring 2013 | ||
| Chrysler | 2007 300C | laser, for a limited time, now uses a Bosch radar-based system | ||
| Dodge | 2011 Charger | radar, by Bosch | ||
| Jeep | 2011 Grand Cherokee, Grand Cherokee (2014+) - 20+ mph (Option on Limited & Overland, standard on Summit)[20] | radar, by Bosch | ||
| Ford | 2011 Explorer, Taurus, 2006 Mondeo, 2013 Fusion, S-Max, Galaxy, 2010 Taurus, 2011 Edge, Focus | radar[21] | ||
| Lincoln | 2009 MKS, 2011 Lincoln MKT, 2010 MKT, 2011 MKX | |||
| Honda | 2003 Inspire, 2005 Legend, 2013 Accord (USA), 2007 CR-V series III | Adaptive Cruise Control and Collision Mitigating Braking System | ||
| Mazda | 2014 Mazda6, Mazda3 | Radar Cruise Control and Forward Obstruction Warning[22] | ||
| Acura | 2014 RLX, 2014 MDX | 2005 RL, MDX, ZDX | ||
| Nissan | 1998 Cima, Primera T-Spec Models | Intelligent Cruise Control | ||
| Infiniti | EX (2010+) | older, laser based system | 2008 EX, M, Q45, QX56, G35, FX35/45/50, G37 | shuts off below 3 mph, EX: in North America as an option, shuts off below 40 km/h |
| Toyota | 1997 Celsior, 2009 Sienna (XLE Limited Edition), Avalon, Sequoia (Platinum Edition), Avensis, 2009 Corolla (Japan),[19] 2010 Prius | |||
| Lexus | 2006 LS 460, 2013 GS hybrid | Dynamic Radar Cruise Control LS 460 full ACC not available in US |
2000 LS430/460 (laser and radar), RX (laser and radar), GS, IS, ES 350, and LX 570 (shuts off below 30 mph) | |
| Subaru | Legacy, Outback (2013+) Forester (2014) | EyeSight[23][24] Non-Radar Camera System | ||
| Hyundai | Genesis | Smart Cruise Control, delayed | ||
ACC的盲點在於安全距離內不能被剪線，被剪線後煞車在車輛還沒減速到安全距離內， 一樣會會追撞。除非你的煞車系統大於前車，才能在"有acc又沒完全安全距離下煞停"，
你講的情況目前用ACC+Collision Warning with Full Auto Brake 反應速度還是比人快太多,你只要證明人的速度能比電腦快就能證明人開車會比電腦好,而且可以長時間永遠專注100%在道路上. 看一下Audi的ACC範例吧.
chris chi wrote:
是阿...所以不想再...(恕刪)
個人積分：69分
文章編號：45718926
ACC從1996年就開始有人在研究了.
論文
一個電子零件要放到車載規格用都要通過一堆驗證了,更何況是一套系統,裝上去萬一駕駛人因為使用ACC導致判斷錯誤在美國可是讓大家變超級大富翁的. 我列一下目前有在用的車商.
BMW
Mercedes-Benz
Volkswagen
Audi
Bentley
Porsche
Land Rover
Volvo
Cadillac
Chevrolet
Acura
Infiniti
Lexus
Subaru
只要可以發生一起案例,這套系統將會受到嚴重質疑. 認證的嚴格度各位有在業界作車載的都知道,難如登天.
不雨 wrote:
樓主可以講到未來去那...(恕刪)
annyning0720 wrote:
還好最後還好~不然就...(恕刪)
個人積分：10593分
文章編號：45719380
個人積分：257分
文章編號：45719450
個人積分：31分
文章編號：45719456
個人積分：69分
文章編號：45719561
個人積分：69分
文章編號：45719665
個人積分：31分
文章編號：45723979
billandcs wrote:
物理上限/物理 又不是同一件事情,物理上限就像是要煞車系統從100KM/HR->0KM/HR在0.1秒辦到.這根本不可能,除非撞上一面牆了,而煞車這件事情從頭到尾就是個物理現象....懂?...(恕刪)
不陪你鬼打牆了，你自己從1樓開始看，有誰提到物理上限是你自己所謂的0.1秒，
是你搞不清楚保持的距離和煞車距離不同，不要再紙上談兵，
你自己找沒車的地方試試看從時速100煞車踩到底不放，要多少距離，
abs的反饋、車體對於急煞的反應如何，在有心理準備下，自己試最清楚不過！
以這個事故來說車主停的下來，他並沒撞到前車，為何會往右偏？
眾多因素其中最大因素是對自己的車子沒信心，他認為停不下來才直覺想閃開，
瞭解自己車子的性能才能讓自己在危險中，降到最低的傷害。
