1st Place: Toyota Sienna SE
Brilliant (for a minivan) driving dynamics and intelligent second- and third-row packaging make for the smartest choice. The good looks don't hurt its case.
優異(對一款廂型車來說)的行車動態表現與聰明的第二排與第三排的空間運用方式讓這款車成為最明智的選擇。它好看的外型也不是件壞事。
2nd Place: Honda Odyssey EX-L
The rich interior isn't enough to make up for this giant's doldrums driving dynamics or goofy exterior treatment. Interior packaging isn't as good as in the Toyota, either.
豪華的內裝並不足以彌補這巨物的沉悶的行車動態表現與怪異的外型。同時車室空間的運用也並不如Toyota。
3rd Place: Dodge Caravan SXT
Stow 'n' Go is still good enough to let this otherwise dated Dodge play with the big boys. A refresh is coming, and not a minute too soon.
Stow 'n' Go的車室運用設計仍足以讓這款在其它方面都顯得老舊的Dodge跟新車款拼一拼。小改款就快來了,而且一分鐘也不能再耽擱了。
實測油耗:
2011 Toyota Sienna SE 21.3英哩/加崙
2011 Honda Odyssey EX-L 21.1英哩/加崙
2010 Dodge Caravan SXT 17.4英哩/加崙
實測0-60mph加速:
2011 Toyota Sienna SE 7.1秒
2010 Dodge Caravan SXT 7.6秒
2011 Honda Odyssey EX-L 7.9秒
實測1/4英哩加速:
2011 Toyota Sienna SE 15.4秒 @ 92.6mph
2010 Dodge Caravan SXT 15.9秒 @ 86.5mph
2011 Honda Odyssey EX-L 16.1秒 @ 89.1mph
實測45-65mph中段超車/再加速能力:
2011 Toyota Sienna SE 3.4秒
2011 Honda Odyssey EX-L 3.8秒
2010 Dodge Caravan SXT 4.1秒
實測60mph-0煞車:
2011 Toyota Sienna SE 121英呎
2011 Honda Odyssey EX-L 125英呎
2010 Dodge Caravan SXT 128英呎
實測抓地力:
2011 Toyota Sienna SE 0.74g
2011 Honda Odyssey EX-L 0.73g
2010 Dodge Caravan SXT 0.67g
實測MotorTrend賽道圈速:
2011 Toyota Sienna SE 28.6秒 @ 0.59g
2011 Honda Odyssey EX-L 29.4秒 @ 0.56g
2010 Dodge Caravan SXT 30.5秒 @ 0.52g
實測車款售價:
2010 Dodge Caravan SXT $32,575
2011 Toyota Sienna SE $34,418
2011 Honda Odyssey EX-L $35,230
詳見:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/minivans-vans/1012_2011_toyota_sienna_se_vs_2011_honda_odyssey_ex_l_vs_2010_dodge_caravan_sxt_comparison/results.html
jimmyesther wrote:
TO HYC 大大 ...(恕刪)
Toyota recalling 94,000 2011 Sienna minivans over brake light bracket issue
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/13/toyota-recalling-94-000-2011-sienna-minivans-over-brake-light-br/