nocar wrote:
這話題從BBS時代戰...(恕刪)
不過有問題的言論
需要大家提出來討論
不然之後上媒體傳播
jiahsien wrote:
不就只是沒看路而已？...(恕刪)
有人就說上視野不足
camryvolvo wrote:
騎機車不是不時都要轉...(恕刪)
YES
jrfrog wrote:
那個懂濺衣只是想選立...(恕刪)
最怕是節目大談這些
然後就誤導別人
skuldly4948 wrote:
一票人連樓主的文章內...(恕刪)
感謝您 (淚目)
湯小花 wrote:
眼鏡族發聲一下瓜皮、...(恕刪)
日本有對應安全帽的眼鏡
chiayingcool wrote:
剛剛出門戴上全罩式安...(恕刪)
(握)
cycleral wrote:
樓主您的論點的假設前...(恕刪)
是啊 不過中華民國機車黨的假設
就是頭不動眼不動
七七三 wrote:
這問題不就普通道路不...(恕刪)
這篇就是我先前提到的2007新聞
後來被原文作者打臉的
所以說，這謬論還是造成了......
skuldly4948 wrote:
你用的這篇文章早就被...(恕刪)
感謝支援
nsr150xx wrote:
隨便兔曹一下避免觸犯...(恕刪)
我還在想誰會把單眼/雙眼混在一起談
隨便兔曹一下
本文的數據是單眼
下文是雙眼
us driving requirements
Alabama
Visual standards for licensing are 20/40 acuity with both eyes and a horizontal
temporal field of at least 110 degrees from the center.
Wyoming
if the minimum total combined horizontal field of vision requirement of 120 degrees cannot be met,
they are given a driver vision evaluation form that must be completed by the driver’s vision s
pecialist.
oyc4388 wrote:
我的安全帽插上下巴就...(恕刪)
感謝支援
cinnamon coffee wrote:
全罩安全帽有視覺死角...(恕刪)
比目魚
