vanjames wrote:
and ask yourself if you want to keep going back to dealer trying to fix something they can not even know where is wrong.
yes/there are so many people in USA/canada drive BMW because those are mostly lease cars,they dont buy BMW out because after 3 years all funny problems start to pop up then you will feel you are so stupid yourself bought a fancy car but you need to call flatbed all the time.
BMW makes really good car like E30(I have one).Newer BMW seem to me only good for 3 years.
這段是典型沒任何實證經驗而毫無根據的論點。
您說美加BMW新車租賃的占大多數是因為BMW三年後就問題重重，請問您如何得來這個結論?
那我請問今年的票選美國前十大最常被消費者租賃的廠牌，神車TOYOTA跟LEXUS雙雙上榜。難不成TOYOTA跟LEXUS也是三年後就一堆破銅爛鐵的爛貨?
TOP TEN MOST LEASED
如果有接觸理財資訊的人就都不陌生，在歐美租賃汽車是中上收入者的理財手法之一。要開同等級的汽車他如果不買而用租賃的，這樣他花在車子這種消耗材的支出就相形減少，進而就可以把剩下來的錢轉到投資獲利的活動上。這就是為何在美國1A2B、LEXUS、跟凱迪拉克這種高級品牌都是租賃的大宗；這種車都是有經濟能力的人在開。
他們租賃著眼點在於以少錢開好車，跟車子的什麼三年後耐用性毫無關聯。
我這種人跟歐美人相比是比較傻，我車子喜歡那種買斷的擁有踏實感，所以不喜歡租賃。我的E60也已開了4年多，照您的論點不就似乎該進廢車廠了?
