巴伐利亞帝王-2013 M5 試駕報告兼論性能房車

951分

樓主

個人積分：951分

文章編號：41845897

雙石英醫生錶 wrote:
Joseph大welcome back. I bought the F30 based on your previous review and were very pleased with it. Thank you for your new review on M5, keep up the good work.

crazeforprp wrote:

講那麼多不代表我喜歡M5, 其實我最不懂的就是m5這樣的大型房跑, 性能（速度，硬調）和房車（舒適，軟調）兩個沖突的結合，記得一個Bently CGT的車主跟我説過，他開Bently 時最怕的就是高速過彎，和911相比，CGT整台車好像要飛出去了,我當時想，那 s63 不更可怕。...(恕刪)

As much as I love the F10 M5, I still prefer an SUV base on practicality。Getting in and out of an SUV is way easier than a super sedan.

雙石英醫生錶大,

Nice to sse you again, thanks for the compliment! So glad to hear you that you made a good choice. SUV's space is always good for family and utility, but please make sure to get a eco-one!

Joseph

tsuyao

3415分

72樓

tsuyao

個人積分：3415分

文章編號：41848019

crazeforprp wrote:
性價比重要，但很多luxury products 其實性價比都很低的^_^（例如我最不懂的就是柏金包，不像錶或車，又不跑不動，幹嘛那摸貴啊）

當然還有就是weekend fun cars, 上千萬的車星期六，日才開出來溜溜，何來性價比呢？^_^

只要買主高興花的錢覺得滿意就是性價比最高^_^

講那麼多不代表我喜歡M5, 其實我最不懂的就是m5這樣的大型房跑, 性能（速度，硬調）和房車（舒適，軟調）兩個沖突的結合，記得一個Bently CGT的車主跟我説過，他開Bently 時最怕的就是高速過彎，和911相比，CGT整台車好像要飛出去了,我當時想，那 s63 不更可怕。

性價比是您先提出的我只是順著講一下

跟一般消費品比奢侈品的性價比一定不高這個道理小朋友都知道這裡講的當然是在選擇同檔次的奢侈品時在沒有特定品牌情節狀況下性價比還是消費者的考量點之一

買主高興花的錢覺得滿意"不"一定是性價比最高而是邊際效益最大 (印象中經濟學老師好像是這麼說的哈)

didio

88分

73樓

didio

個人積分：88分

文章編號：41849018

感謝J大再次分享文章!!

建議J大PO文就好,不必回文!! 每個人有表達自己意見的權利,不必隨之起舞

您PO文的原意只是分享心得,參與討論的話反而讓持反面意見的網友,掀起更多筆戰

crazeforprp

12分

74樓

crazeforprp

個人積分：12分

文章編號：41849061

雙石英醫生錶 wrote:
Getting in and out of an SUV is way easier than a super sedan....(恕刪)

Now I know why you sold your 997, perhaps you should consider calling your fitness instructor to plan out a routine workout schedule for you! LOL

Kidding aside, don't forget to drop us some photos when your new SUV is in town !