雖然生死有命,但多少自己還是可以盡些努力
買車時能力所及盡量買安全點的車,開車時盡量提高警覺,保持行車安全,其他除了求平安符, 大概剩下就是交給命運了
我覺得大加發表意見也不用執著於某一點,例如小車是不是不安全,有不同意見就是參考參考
不管其他車廠的小車是不是安全點,相信每個選車人都慎重考慮過

我跟老婆閒聊時問他說如果我們月收入是現在的兩倍,那他會想買什麼車,他很快的跟我說買VW
現在沒買VW就是因為錢不是那麼多,比起來Alto以其45萬左右的價位,在安全表現上確實相當超值了
arithman wrote:
雖然生死有命,但多少...(恕刪)

說的好,當初我也是在預算有限的情況下,才在經費許可的範圍內選擇alto
本來還去看了二手的march,要價要26萬,已經要下訂了
臨下訂前的那個星期,看到水果報報導alto,臨時踩了煞車,改投向alto懷抱
現在想起來,沒選二手march,選擇alto真是明智的抉擇,開新車感覺還是比較棒的
至於i10,我家沒排韓情結,也不討厭這部車,不選它的原因,純粹就女王不喜歡它的名稱諧音罷了
如果有錢,今天早上看到一台benz a190
我想要買這台給女王
相信車廠都有他們行銷的考量
有些車也許就是定位成都會型,所以某些長途或高速行駛建議配備的裝備就省下了
B牌A class的車看起來也很讚啊,但經濟能力不許可

我是真的親眼見過縣道上兩台車迎面對撞,縣道喔,就是說理論上車速大概50km/hr,不過對撞的威力是不是相當100km/hr的能量?
一台是喜美,一台是B牌,結果怎樣大家應該猜的到吧,喜美車頭幾乎全毀,B牌看起來好像沒被撞過
不過兩邊的人都沒事

現在很多小車是做引擎室撞擊時會潰縮,但重點強化在駕駛室,所以迎面撞擊時大概這台車不用修了,直接送屠宰廠
但重點只要駕駛跟副駕乘客安全就是了,這也是安全氣囊跟安全帶之所以重要的因素

國產車10年新款都規定必須配備雙安全氣囊,總算是一大進步

derik wrote:
是呀是呀我是壞心忌妒...(恕刪)



大大,查了一下,三顆星是只有兩顆氣囊,Suzuki 已經針對NCAP 2009的結果進行改善
1. EPS Optional
2. electronic stability control ESC standard,

Following a three-star rating gained in the latest Euro NCAP tests, Suzuki decided to upgrade the Alto mini car with ESP as optional on one of the three lower trims. The disappointing result was mainly brought by poor ratings in adult occupant protection, child protection and safety assistance, according to the official results of the Euro NCAP testings.

"In response to Euro NCAP's new rating scheme, Suzuki have decided to make electronic stability control an option on all variants of the Alto and standard on some. Sales of ESC as standard equipment are not expected to meet Euro NCAP's requirements for the full three points to be awarded but are sufficient to gain the car an additional point for this area of assessment. A driver's seatbelt reminder system is standard equipment," Euro NCAP said in the results.
然後三顆星的NCAP 是沒有Side airbag, 所以ANCAP(澳洲NCAP 重測有Side airbag 後給他總體4顆星4 full stars;但對行人不友善
http://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/ancap/suzuki/alto-2009.html


The vehicle tested by Euro NCAP did not have side curtains. These are standard on the Australasian model but, since the head score was a full 4 points in the European test, the presence of side curtains is unlikely to change the score in this test. Head-protecting side airbags can provide protection in more severe side impacts such as that reproduced in the ANCAP pole test. However, since the offset test score was less than 12.5 (the minimum for a 5-star rating) the Australasian Alto was not eligible for this test, which can earn a further two points.
但他對行人很不友善.

Thanks.

能力許可的話,
還是買小型車級距的Suzuki Swift安全性比較夠,
當然Ford Fiesta 5D安全性也OK啦~
嗯... 浮上來說句公道話...

大家認為的"小車"指的是"排氣量"還是"車身尺寸"?
我想,如果單指"排氣量"(因為樓主有提及稅金的考量)
同等級的車輛,差不多的價格,好像只有i10跟Fresh?
再加上"排韓""愁中"情節,似乎只剩下alto?

嗯... 繼續潛水...
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!