有些車也許就是定位成都會型,所以某些長途或高速行駛建議配備的裝備就省下了
B牌A class的車看起來也很讚啊,但經濟能力不許可
我是真的親眼見過縣道上兩台車迎面對撞,縣道喔,就是說理論上車速大概50km/hr,不過對撞的威力是不是相當100km/hr的能量?
一台是喜美,一台是B牌,結果怎樣大家應該猜的到吧,喜美車頭幾乎全毀,B牌看起來好像沒被撞過
不過兩邊的人都沒事
現在很多小車是做引擎室撞擊時會潰縮,但重點強化在駕駛室,所以迎面撞擊時大概這台車不用修了,直接送屠宰廠
但重點只要駕駛跟副駕乘客安全就是了,這也是安全氣囊跟安全帶之所以重要的因素
國產車10年新款都規定必須配備雙安全氣囊,總算是一大進步
derik wrote:
是呀是呀我是壞心忌妒...(恕刪)
大大,查了一下,三顆星是只有兩顆氣囊,Suzuki 已經針對NCAP 2009的結果進行改善
1. EPS Optional
2. electronic stability control ESC standard,
Following a three-star rating gained in the latest Euro NCAP tests, Suzuki decided to upgrade the Alto mini car with ESP as optional on one of the three lower trims. The disappointing result was mainly brought by poor ratings in adult occupant protection, child protection and safety assistance, according to the official results of the Euro NCAP testings.
"In response to Euro NCAP's new rating scheme, Suzuki have decided to make electronic stability control an option on all variants of the Alto and standard on some. Sales of ESC as standard equipment are not expected to meet Euro NCAP's requirements for the full three points to be awarded but are sufficient to gain the car an additional point for this area of assessment. A driver's seatbelt reminder system is standard equipment," Euro NCAP said in the results.
然後三顆星的NCAP 是沒有Side airbag, 所以ANCAP(澳洲NCAP 重測有Side airbag 後給他總體4顆星4 full stars;但對行人不友善
http://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/ancap/suzuki/alto-2009.html
The vehicle tested by Euro NCAP did not have side curtains. These are standard on the Australasian model but, since the head score was a full 4 points in the European test, the presence of side curtains is unlikely to change the score in this test. Head-protecting side airbags can provide protection in more severe side impacts such as that reproduced in the ANCAP pole test. However, since the offset test score was less than 12.5 (the minimum for a 5-star rating) the Australasian Alto was not eligible for this test, which can earn a further two points.
但他對行人很不友善.
Thanks.