小弟目前有一台筆電,想換一個7200轉硬碟, 請問一下各位達人哪種硬碟較好?(WD 320GB 7200轉WD3200BJKT or SEAGATE 7200.3 320GB 7200轉 ST9320421ASG).可否請你們提供一下寶貴的意見
價格大概多少?
lnytkw wrote:
小弟目前有一台筆電,...(恕刪)
7200.3 as 的話一般只有賣這台, 沒有防落下功能 asg
wd bjkt有避震約4099 y購物, asg5099 as 4899
啟動電壓seagate 7200.3 1 A WD 0.5A
播放DVD WD> Seagate
大量傳輸檔案 seagate > WD
最快速度 seagate > WD
總合的省電 WD> Seagate
個人是買wd 320g 因為兩台都五年保固, 國內送修的話 捷元>Seagate聯強
兩台都可國外送修
筆電很少用到最大傳輸速度,不如要求省電一點
最後,兩台都很熱.. 如果您原來的筆電hd部分就有微溫的話 推薦您換seagate 5400.6 500gb的 或wd的blue lable 5400轉的
www.tomshardware.com 請看storage 區 有這兩台的比較 (英文)
#2 Western Digitalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Digital ’s new Scorpio Black has arrived with a bang. It has the fastest access time and great I/O performance, beating all the other 2.5” hard drives. Though its throughput cannot quite match the transfer rates of the Seagate drive, WD manages to get excellent results in all of the benchmarks. And despite good but not exciting power consumption results, we found some surprises: WD implemented a sensible power management solution, which has the drive consume the least power at low-power idle and when playing DVD video off the HDD.
#1 Seagate Momentus 7200.3. We were looking at the four hard drives from a mobile user’s perspective, so we paid close attention to performance per watt ratings. Not only does Seagate hit new transfer rate records, but it also beats the competition by providing the best combination of low power consumption and high performance. It might not win all the benchmarks, but overall it is on top. Its lead over WD was very small, though.
總結 wd一般使用下比較省電(打字 撥dvd) access i/o也比較快, seagate最高傳輸速度最快.在高傳輸下seagate比較省電 兩台幾乎是平分的
最終差異變成價格差異了.