Benz C-class被列為不安全!? IIHS發布新撞擊測試標準

怎麼大家都看影片說故事?
IIHS網站上都有詳細testing &rating protocol ,每台車點進去也有得分跟失分項目,
倒是有幾台車,車門開了或掉了還過關是很奇怪,因為rating protocol 特別題這種屬於馬上不及格的(poor)。

Han-Tung Li wrote:
怎麼大家都看影片說故...(恕刪)


因為有些人懶得聽懶得看英文解釋...
直接認為 1A2B 這麼貴測試應該就是無敵...
IIHS是來瞎搞胡搞的...

直接就看影片說故事嘴炮....
這在mobile 01 很正常...
一堆嘴砲,那麼厲害你來測,反正你用看的就知道是poor還是good

人家VOLVO跟Acura會得到GOOD不是因為"剛好"打側邊球,而是人家車廠花了多久才研發出的車體結構

還有人說什麼輪胎都飛掉還安全嗎?
你管他哪裡飛掉,最重要的是人沒受傷,不是嗎?
那F1撞下去只剩下中間的座艙,難道不安全嗎?
http://www.examiner.com/article/new-crash-test-results-may-weigh-heavily-on-carmakers?cid=rss
MB(抗辯方)說
Mercedes-Benz said in a statement that the test re-creates an "unusually severe and correspondingly uncommon accident scenario" that put the C class at a disadvantage.
Mercedes added that the "real-world kinematics of vehicles involved in this type of crash are very different from the construct of the IIHS test."
"這測試是異常嚴重而且相較之下少見的事故場景"
"現實中發生此類正面側邊小面積撞擊的車輛, 結果都跟IIHS這個測試很不一樣"

Honda說
Honda expressed concerns because the alterations could affect handling, ride comfort and fuel economy. Still, the company said in a statement that it will begin making "structural enhancements" on upcoming vehicles this year with the second generation of its Advanced Compatibility Engineering body structure.
"要改進的話可能會影響到操控, 舒適還有油耗"
"第二代的ACE結構會針對這個測試做加強"

http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120814/OEM11/120819945/1128/new-insurance-institute-crash-test-trips-several-upscale-models
Toyota說
Toyota said in a statement that there will not be a "one-size-fits-all" solution to achieving "greater crash protection in this area."
"With this new test, the Institute has raised the bar again and we will respond to this challenge as we design new vehicles," the company said.
"針對這種測試沒有單一解法"
"未來新車種設計將會去解決這個問題"

VW說
Volkswagen and Audi each said it is "passionately committed to building the safest vehicles available to the public and has already begun to incorporate this latest knowledge into the design and engineering of our cars going forward."
"會研究這次結果並在未來設計時加入考量"


Sleeace wrote:
http://www...(恕刪)


已經有車廠說明了,現在就期待後續的發展了。

加強車體安全性,這對於使用者來說是好事,當然還是得配上良好的駕駛習慣。

henrylai21 wrote:
有可能喔, 說不定以後車會設計成一撞就散, 只留下一個車室, 這樣可能才是最安全的考量吧?


其實這是真的...因為爆開才會把衝撞力道分散出去...
車室完整才是最重要的...

可以看看F1的設計就是如此...

全車碳纖維打造,一撞車幾乎整台爆開..撞擊力道就隨著碎片飛散
只有駕駛艙是完整的....



難怪我開起來覺的怪怪的...
感覺跟國產車差不多..


有神人可以用腦內運算一下我國國產車哪一台去那邊能拿good

64066406 wrote:
有神人可以用腦內運算...(恕刪)


CM-32 雲豹

64066406 wrote:
有神人可以用腦內運算...(恕刪)


開SMART拖去融我想應該也會是GOOD

因為SMART只要沒有正面撞上 任何側邊撞擊對SMART來說 會讓SMART變成一顆球滾走



文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 12)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!