想請問站上的菁英競賽組選手們,
你們大多選用哪一種大盤組來當作自己的愛用款,
練習用或競賽用會分開嗎?
像是陽金公路或汐止大尖山和五指山之類的山路,
會使用哪種大盤來騎?
環花東這種長程起伏的路線,又是選擇哪種?
如果你錢夠多 是有人 準備兩台車 一台是標準盤 另一台就是 CT盤 不過這種人只會出現在 環法選手中才看的到 而且都是有贊助廠商在供養的 至於一般人 就看你自己 有骨氣的就用 標準盤 如果你想爬山 又怕上不去那就用 CT 盤 至於3盤沒有人說不可以用 單車的力量都是來自你的雙腳
我想要標準盤又想要CT盤,但我又不想要搞兩台車!!!

所以我用53/39/30的大盤,平路、山路一次通吃~~

「能受天磨真鐵漢,不遭人忌是庸才」
zulutsai wrote:
我想要標準盤又想要C...(恕刪)


一體式大盤直接抽換啊...除了CAMPY系統,其他幾乎5-10min就換好了

現在大盤很好換了...比起以錢...特別是四方孔時代,現在真是方便
歡迎來Aq's Bike http://aqbike.blogspot.com/
我用过标准盘10年及新用50/34盘。我觉得50/34盘非常适合我, 因为我骑平路均速33-35km/h, 90-100RPM, chain刚好在後飞轮的19齿"4th",17齿"5th"(最大数下来,25-11飞轮)。如果用标准盘, chain会落在2nd,3rd齿, chain斜角大,损耗大,噪音大,效率小。

当然我是业馀、优闲骑行型。不比赛、不攻击。作叁考!
請問更換大齒盤後中變是否也要調整?
豪1979 wrote:
想請問站上的菁英競賽...(恕刪)


大多53/39啦

甚至53/44啦

要用到50/34都是很可怕的連續陡坡...台灣沒有哇哈哈...

一般時用50/34? 爬坡輸人不要緊,連下坡平路都輸人追都追不回來

特別是順風,真是欲哭無淚
歡迎來Aq's Bike http://aqbike.blogspot.com/
團圓嚕 wrote:
請問更換大齒盤後中變...(恕刪)


要的

不過中變調整不要太龜毛也算快啦
歡迎來Aq's Bike http://aqbike.blogspot.com/
zulutsai wrote:
我想要標準盤又想要C...(恕刪)


我看到campy 的官网,CT盘加12-29飞轮的齿轮比会盖过以往的triple盘。http://www.campagnolo.com/jsp/en/newsdetail/newsid_124_newscatid_3.jsp


11DEC
2009
2 IS MORE THAN 3
COMPACT 11SPEED CRANKSET VS TRIPLE 10SPEED CRANKSET
The natural evolution of technologies and the development of new designs often mean that certain products, though still valid, lose significance when compared to new solutions available on the market.
This is the case of the triple crankset.

Already some years back, with the introduction of the compact crankset, the number of users of the triple fell considerably, marking a trend that has continuously diminished year by year.

With Campagnolo's introduction of the 11-speed groupsets last season, thanks to the presence of 11 rear sprockets to choose from, the advantage given by the compact became even more accentuated.
Today, thanks to the new 12-29 sprocket set, the compact crankset has made a decisive step forward with respect to the triple.

Taking as an example a classic triple configuration (53-42-30) associated with a 13-29 sprocket set and comparing it with a compact 50-34 and the brand new 12-29 sprocket set, it is not surprising to note that the new sprocket with 29 teeth associated with the 34 of the compact allows metric developments similar to those of a triple crankset with a rear sprocket 29 (30 cm of difference).
Even for the hardest ratios, the two configurations are very close in terms of metric development: the 53-13 of the triple compared to the 50-12 of the compact has a difference of only 20 cm.

In addition to all this is the fact that the compact crankset enables huge savings in terms of element weight, which is especially crucial when confronting demanding climbs where the force of gravity plays against the rider. A reduction of the Q and U factors and less intersection and overlapping of the ratios with consequent better chain alignment are further advantages given by the use of the compact.

And that's not all. There is also the enormous advantage of not having to change the rocker arm of the 11-speed rear derailleur already purchased in order to fit the brand new 12-29 sprocket set, the real and incredible news.

Thanks, therefore, to 11-speed technology and to the new 12-29 sprocket set, the era of the triple seems to be drawing to a close. Today, all cycling enthusiasts can confront the most challenging climbs even without being in top condition.



Comparative table - similarities and differences in metric development between compact and triple.




恩~

如果大盤用53/39配上12-29的飛輪
結果會不會跟C/T盤差不多?
關閉廣告
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!