雖然心痛但是值得

391分

91樓

個人積分：391分

文章編號：49424600

推倒胡 wrote:
如果樓主開頭先以本例說明疲勞駕駛的不當，並引以為戒，附帶再說明車輛安全性的重要，我想讀者的反應會完全不同!

結果，這樣的事卻先提車輛安全、祖先保佑...，對事故的主因僅輕描淡寫，難怪有些人在乎的是樓主老婆以後會不會繼續開車!幫不了你

這麼說好了
這篇文章算不算引以為戒？
難道發這篇文章還要把自己的老婆再鞭一次？
當事人也受傷了，精神也驚嚇了，暫時也不開車了，樓主車也全損了
夠不夠？

事故的主因輕描淡寫
那你想要多精采？
意外發生只有那麼一兩秒
車子翻滾也要好幾秒，算十秒好了
你期望車內的人在這十二秒中要有什麼心得與經歷描述？
正常人抓東西，大叫這樣而已
車內的人誰在乎車子什麼角度翻了一圈？

輕描淡寫？
來篇身入其境的意外現場吧

車子是男人的玩具，我熱愛我的捷安特鋼管車。說對的話，做對的事

大頭鼻祖

0分

92樓

大頭鼻祖

個人積分：0分

文章編號：49424608

安全無價!~
花錢消災!~
恭喜車主一家平安!!!

catmoo

448分

93樓

catmoo

個人積分：448分

文章編號：49424695

魔人真的一大堆~... orz

VOLVO對安全性操控性是好車拉但是對於保養

總之我是已經離開VOLVO這個家族了省下來的錢夠我每年出國2~4次

但不可某認 V牌和雙B牌開起來感覺就是不太一樣

gamli

945分

94樓

gamli

個人積分：945分

文章編號：49424726

樓主跟我的想法一樣...
我在兩年前因為老婆每天要開車接送小孩上下學..
所以就把把家裡的CRV換成V60....
在考量買自己個人的保險時候...買台安全的車也是保險的一種...
買安全的車就是在這時候發揮作用...
可惜酸民還是只能繼續酸....
叫人家去坐計程車...
如果全部計程車都是VOLVO安全等級...
我就不要買車了...
改坐計程車....
無奈路上幾乎都是神車級的計程車...
所以樓主你還是不要讓你老婆坐計程車...

計程車遭追撞

archos

181分

95樓

archos

個人積分：181分

文章編號：49424844

derjiann wrote:
一來因為老婆大人原來的F牌嘉年華年事已高
二來為了老婆大人的安全
所以在去年5月幫老婆大人換了台V40
想不到在本月中老婆大人居然疲勞駕駛
開車開到睡著自撞安全島然後翻車
原本接到老婆電話時想說應該還好...(恕刪)

記得下次不要放出來害人~~

Asafes

0分

96樓

Asafes

個人積分：0分

文章編號：49424977

1. Volvo是公認安全性最佳的車廠之一。這點幾乎無人會反對，無需置喙。
2. 如果有猝睡症狀，最好不要開車。如果是疲勞駕駛，請參考第3點。
3. 疲勞駕駛與酒駕一樣，無論是任何原因造成的，都是危險駕駛。個人經驗，找個合適(合法又安全)的地方先暫停，依自身狀況瞇個十來分鐘到一、兩小時，效果很好。防範於未然，安全的車，也要安全的駕駛。
4. 如果方便的話，樓主是否可以說明新購XC60車色與經常行駛區域，以利其他用路人留意。

以下空白

推倒胡

7分

97樓

推倒胡

個人積分：7分

文章編號：49425071

castle0531 wrote:
輕描淡寫？
來篇身入其境的意外現場吧...(恕刪)

本人不曾發生過這等鳥事，恕無法身入其境... ^++^

JJ303

40分

98樓

JJ303

個人積分：40分

文章編號：49425321

樓主的修養很好，比起前一陣子某網友其夫人開車為了撿東西而撞警車那位好多了...
有人把疲勞駕駛與酒駕相提並論，個人覺得還是有不小差異
酒駕可以說是明知故犯，明知喝酒而上路，罪有應得
但疲勞駕駛有時是出現在上路一段時間後，實非上路前就能預期(但疲勞發生時就應休息)
總之，開車疲勞的經驗大家或多或少都會有，差別只是在有無出事或停下來休息而已

不是為疲勞駕駛合理化，只是利用這篇文互相提醒不是更好? 開車累了真的別逞強

除了疲勞駕駛，那些變換車道不打方向燈、頂者別人屁股開(110km/hr不算龜車吧)、天黑不開大燈(自發光儀表板影響??)、動輒開到14、16格的....也同樣讓人避而遠之，說不定酸民中就有這樣的人....

言歸正傳，VOLVO的安全性再次得到實證，還是謝謝樓主分享，也希望所有注重車體安全的車主，也同樣注重他人的用路安全

Griffon0906

48分

99樓

Griffon0906

個人積分：48分

文章編號：49425556

人命無價

好車一台

撞的好慘

derjiann wrote:
一來因為老婆大人原來...(恕刪)

celestar

128分

100樓

celestar

個人積分：128分

文章編號：49425564

Dear all reader, please forgive me to write something in English.

Volvo is a safety first car. It has unique technology in city safe and others. Allow me to offer some comment about city safe and how this technology works and its limitation. Please forgive me if some of this may not be correct but it is based on my best engineering judgment and observation. I myself drive a Volvo V60.

City-safe (Standard version on all Volvo cars, I believe)

The technology used is not a very 'sophisticated' but it works. It primarily uses a technology called image compare and sensing. When the car speed is below 50km/h, the camera is activated. It captured the image and continous monitor that image. Before it does that, it immediately 'compare' with the data base to determine if any of the subject captured is a known vehicle. Within milliseconds, it can determine if this is the right target (through matching) Embedded in Volvo computer is over 50,000 sets of image profile where it determines if the detected image is a risk and if it is, when the distance or acceleration becomes too fast, it acted - brake hard! The most valuable asset of Volvo is this set of profile. Now, let's take a step back, the so called higher end version of city safet will consist more than 50,000 sets up to 150,000 where profile of human being, pets, motor cycles etc are build in. Again, by the same principle of operation, the computer now has more image to compare and therefore should provide a better coverage of protection. Having said that, let's not forget the power of software algorithm, I personally have come too fast to a parking exiti vending machine to drop my paid parking coin that the system detect that bar of obstruction and it acts! City Safe actually stopped my car abruptly! I based on my above theory on what is being said on Volvo catalog and the fact that standard version of V60 does not have a radar or detector at its front grille.

Please do not mixed up above with ACC. ACC is a totally different system. It is a more advanced system together with the camera system to provide a unique active cruise control system, that is adaptive.

In summary, Volvo system can be said is based on image capture and image determination. It is an engineering marvel that the camera does work in dark or rainy days and it seems to be quite reliable.

The incident in this post, is because running off the track and hit the safety island was never part of the image profile within the computer and therefore the system did not act. Let's not forget what was the speed the lady driver was driving, if it is above 50km/h, all system are off! (If the car turned off after hitting the sidewall, I can imagine there must be some forward momentum and speed going on!)

I am not writing above to promote Volvo. I am sharing what I think is working and again, there are more experts who can correct this for me, for my understanding. Personally, I think Volvo computer must be thinking I am a bad driver because I had more than 9 instances of city drive alert/action during my short 4 months of ownership!

We indeed live in a world of not just hardwares but rather softwares/firmwares combined with hardwares. It is very interesting and threating at times!

雖然心痛但是值得

小惡魔新聞台

小惡魔廣編特輯

小惡魔市集

雖然心痛 但是值得

小惡魔新聞台

小惡魔廣編特輯

小惡魔市集

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦！

雖然心痛但是值得

今日熱門文章　網友點擊推薦！