http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pio/pe/images/portal/cit_3424/273087528Pioneer%20DTV%20White%20Paper%20-%20FINAL.pdf
Plasma HDTV outperforms LCD and DLP says Imaging Science Foundation
Thursday, 11 August 2005
Plasma televisions are an excellent choice for consumers willing to pay a premium according to recent white paper from research firm IDC. The firm based its conclusion on laboratory testing conducted by the Imaging Science Foundation (ISF) in June and July of this year.
In a study paid for by Pioneer Electronics, research firm IDC, in parternership with ISF purchased and tested nine current models of High definition televisions from seven different manufacturers. Three sets were plasma, three were LCD and three were DLP rear projection HDTVs.
The ISF conducted a series of tests which they said were designed to measure picture quality in a way that better represents what consumers really see when watching television. The result was Plasma television technology received high marks versus other popular flat-panel televisions.
"We set out to test long-held stereotypes of TV technologies by collecting real-world test data using methods that align with what people visually perceive when they watch movies and sports," said Bob O’Donnell, vice president, mobility and display technology for IDC. "What we found is that plasma provides viewers with an excellent high-definition viewing experience when it comes to color accuracy, consistency, sharpness, and image detail. Plasma performs particularly well in providing a consistent viewing experience across all viewing angles. This is important if a family or a group of friends is seated around a TV watching a movie or if during a sporting event the action moves across the screen."
With respect to image retention, all three technology types were subjected to a ‘torture’ test in which a static video game image was retained on the TV screen for 48 hours, followed by a 24-hour loop of standard video content. While the plasma TV screen displayed signs of image retention (i.e., ghosting) after the 48-hour full screen test, the 24-hour video loop essentially ‘cleaned’ the screen leaving no perceptible trace of the original static image. On a scale of 1-5, with 1 being "Not Visible" and 5 being "Readily Visible and Clearly Defined," all plasmas tested were rated as 1 or "Not Visible."
"Plasma televisions have long been the subject of misinformation in key performance areas that in our estimation matter most to consumers. The reality is that while other technologies continue to progress in terms of picture quality, plasma continues to deliver a crisp, clear picture that in dark or light settings provides great richness of detail and color," O’Donnell said.
血漿HDTV 勝過LCD 並且DLP 認為想像科學基礎星期四, 2005 年8月11 日血漿電視是一個優秀選擇為消費者願支付保險費根據最近白皮書從研究企業IDC 。企業根據了它的結論實驗室試驗由想像科學基礎舉辦(ISF) 在6月和7月今年。
在研究中被支付由Pioneer Electronics, 研究牢固的IDC, 在parternership 與ISF 被購買和測試了高的定義電視九個當前的模型從七位不同製造商。三個集合是血漿, 三是LCD 並且三是DLP 後方投射HDTVs 。
ISF 進行了他們認為被設計測量圖片質量用方法更好代表的一系列的測試什麼消費者真正地看見當看電視。結果是血漿電視技術被接受的高標記對其它普遍的平板電視。
"我們下決心測試電視技術長期持有的陳腔濫調由收集真實世界的測驗資料運用與的方法什麼人民排列視覺上察覺他們觀看電影和體育," 說鮑伯・O'Donnell, 副總統、流動性和顯示技術為IDC 。"什麼我們發現了是那血漿提供觀察者以優秀高清晰度的觀察經驗當它來上色準確性、一貫性、鋒利, 和圖像細節。血漿執行特別很好在提供一致的觀察經驗橫跨所有觀察角度。這重要如果家庭或一個小組朋友坐在電視附近觀看電影或如果在一個體育事件期間行動行動橫跨屏幕。"
談到圖像保留, 所有三種技術類型被服從了對` 酷刑' 測試一個的靜態電動遊戲圖像被保留在電視屏幕48 個小時, 被標準錄影內容24 小時圈跟隨。當血漿電視屏幕顯示了圖像保留(即, 重像的) 標誌在48 小時全熒光屏測試以後, 24 小時錄影圈` 根本上沒有清洗' 屏幕離開原始的靜態圖像的可認識蹤影。按1-5, 用1 是"不可看見的" 和5 是"欣然可看見和清楚地定義," 所有血漿被測試對了估計作為1 或"不可看見。"
"血漿電視長期是誤傳主題在在我們的估計問題最對消費者的主要勣效區域。現實是當其它技術繼續進步根據圖片質量, 血漿繼續提供在黑暗或光設置提供細節和顏色的偉大的豐厚的一張酥脆, 清楚的圖片, "O'Donnell 說。
