i saw + 名詞子句
i saw (that he was playing video game)
或是i saw him + 受詞補語
i saw him (who he was playing video game)

這樣嗎?
The Wingman wrote:
怎麼會兩種都行....

當然你講給人聽兩種是都可以﹐不過文法上 I saw him play the video game 是錯的。

第二段既然有個動詞﹐那主詞呢?

如果是 him, 那就該用 he, 而且動詞也該用 plays

I saw he plays the video game.....????

I saw 以後除非有 to, and 這種介系詞不然不能再有動詞了。

所以正確的說法是 I saw him playing video games in the living room.


這啥
不能說... wrote:
這啥


他的想法是名詞子句。

I saw (that) he plays the video game in the living room.
→S+V+(that)+名詞子句(作受詞用)

所以他會認為he是三單,要用單數動詞。也因為這樣他會認為兩個句子要有兩個主詞和動詞,但跟感官動詞整個混在一起了。

感官動詞
01不給改暱稱,請叫我柚子 Blog: http://www.3cblog.idv.tw
strawinsky wrote:
i saw him (who he was playing video game)


沒人這樣寫

1. I要永遠大寫

2.who叫做關係代名詞,具備有連接兩句子及代名詞的功用。

→I saw the man who was playing video game in the living room.
01不給改暱稱,請叫我柚子 Blog: http://www.3cblog.idv.tw
總覺得講得愈來愈複雜了

總之我知道兩種說法都是對的,living room的部分應該是用in來當介系詞,這邊先更正。
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!